2005-04-22_REVISION - M1977526 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Revised 8llc v" JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Denver Regulatory Office D{STRICT OFFICZ 0'80059 FLLE NUMBER: PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATLON~ Stake: Colorado 104 51 26 tv Adams itude)~. 39 56 a u lands: _4d~ acres. Coun , ~~ latitudellong including P Center coordinates of site ( arcel) reviewed, Approximate size of area (P South Platte River Creek Name of nearest waterway: Name of watershed: Middle South Platte-Cherry TION ~ Date: JURISDICTIONAL DETpEdRMImnation ® Date{s): Feb 3, OS Completed: Deskto Site visit(s) ~ there aPPear to be no "waters of the reliminary JD is not appealable Jurisdictional Determination (JD)' anon, ^ there appear ro be (or) ' on tfie project ste. A P Q Prelinunary JD -Based on available inform "navigable waters of the United States' as 331) United States' an~0rart 331). ~ within (Reference 33 CFAR ypproved JD is an appealable aenon (Reference 33 CFR P 3 ~ and associated guidance) ® Approved JD - as defined by 33 CFR Part ~nd associated guidance) within the Check all that app1Y~ , There are `"navigableo anate size ofjuri dsctronal area'. art u- nited States (as defined by 33 CFR p the reviewed area. ApP - , There are `°waters of the U urisdict3onal area. We~w,ithin the revrewed area. e1e~inat+on of No reviewed area- Approximate size ofj ltd Rule Information Sheet Eor D ® There are "isotat2d, non-nm~igabte• t'v SWANCC1Mrp atory 9 ® Decision supported b, Jurisdiction. art 329 as "navigable waters of the United States": F JURISDICTIONAL D>:TERM IN r*`IlON' resently used, or have been used in BASIS O CFR P erce A. Waters deIIned under 33 ect to the ebb and1e orate uhf ~+a gn commCe . the ast, or may be susceptible to use in The presence of betsusceptible forbuse to trans ort ast, or may CFR part 328.3(u) ns "waters of the United States'' ~ w of the tide. the p or were used in P sad flu B- Waters defined under 33 which are curra`ItIW 1e`dµhich are sub}ect to the ebb mudflats, (I) The presence of waters erce including intetrmtteni streams), rnterstate wetlands+. tncludinB the use, degrada[ion or Interstate or foreign intents ate waters including rivers, screams ( onds, 0 t?) The presence of ~ wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural p ~ (3) ~e presence of other waters such as intrastate la es, ur oses. rairie potholes, such waters (check all that applY)~. sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, p erce including any _ erce. destruction of which could affect interstate cornet interstate or foreign a d sold m lore state oalfore $nee erce. (i) which are or could be used by u oses by industries in interstate cornet (ii) from which fish or shellfish are or could bwzners of the US- (iii) which are or watetlsbotherwiserdefinedias p ~ I (~) above. (q) Impoundments of except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlan a (S) The presence of a tributacy to a water identified m O - (6) The presence of territorial seas. k ocher waters of the US, ~ the jurisdictional (7) The presence of wetlands adjacent' o Tres to any bases checi:ed above). j ' to the dowrutrervn n¢v eabde the waterhody could wetland is nor itself a navigable water of die United States, describe connections Rationale for the Basis o{Jurisdictional Decermination (npP ewnent the rationale used to water or g is used as Ibe Basis ofJurisd'cttp1' dOGUmenr navigability and/or uiterstate corumeree cannec ro waters !f B(l) or BO inetnding why the waterbodY is navrgablz andlor haw the destnaction o Jurisdiction, do acencY I B(2. 4, 5 or 6) is useA as the Basis of (t.e., discuss site conditions, the Basis of Jurisdiction, doczamenr the rationale used to make a j affect interstate or fore e!f B(7) isrused as make Jre determuration determination: