Laserfiche WebLink
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />Proposed Civil Penalty Assessment <br />Powderhom Coal Company/ The Roadside Portals <br />NOV CV-99-0013 <br />Materials reviewed in conjunction with the preparation of this proposed assessment were: DMG NOV CV- <br />99-013 form, excerpts from the DMG review of the permittce's 1997 and 1998 AHRs, and two letters dated <br />11/2/99 and 11/9/99 from the permit[ce's consulting engineer to DMG. <br />History [Rule 5.04.5(3)(a)]: <br />One NOV has been issued [o this pertnittce within the twelve months preceding the issuance date <br />of this NOV (8/20/99). As the associated settlement agreement has been signed and the civil <br />penalty paid, that NOV is no longer subject to administrative review. The History component is <br />therefore proposed to be set at $50. <br />Seriousness [Rule 5.04.5(3)(b)]: <br />The Seriousness component of a proposed civil penalty assessment may range from $0 to $1750. <br />The assessment shall depend upon whe0ter the violation was one of performance requirements or <br />administrative requirements. This NOV was written for a violation of performance requirements. <br />In the case of a violation of performance requirements, the amount to be assessed for Seriousness <br />shall also be based on the degree of impact the violation had upon the public or envivonment. <br />This NOV was written for the pennittee's failure to conduct hydrologic monitoring and reporting <br />in accordance with the permittee's DMG permit and the State's regulations. Some of the data <br />cited in the NOV as not having been collected has subsequently been provided to DMG; however, <br />a portion of the data was, due to equipment problems and other unspecified reasons, simply not <br />obtained. Based upon comments from DMG Staff, however, I am inclined to believe that the <br />failure of the permi[tee to obtain and therefore record this data did not significantly impact the <br />public or the environment. The Seriousness component is therefore proposed to be set at $500. <br />Fault [Rule 5.04.5(3)(c)]: <br />The fault component of a proposed civil penalty assessment may range from $0 to $1500. <br />Assessments for "unavoidable" violations may range from $0 to $250. Assessments for violations <br />that were dte result of "negligence" may range from $250 to $750. Assessments for violations that <br />resulted from "intentional conduct" may range from $750 [o $1500. <br />The permittce's failure to obtain all required water monitoring data, to provide recorded data to the <br />DMG as required, and especially to promptly repair anon-functioning water monitoring device, <br />indicates that this NOV occurred as a result of a moderate degree of "negligence". The Fault <br />component is therefore proposed to be set at $500. <br />Cood Faith in Achieving Compliance ]Rule 5.04.5(3)(d)]: <br />As this NOV has not yet been fully abated, no reduction of this assessment is proposed at this <br />lime. <br />The Total Proposed Civil Penalty Assessment for this NOV is therefore $1000. <br />