ENFORCE27747 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

L • III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,~ UNPER1bIITTED CONSTRUCTIOPd MATERIAL EXT-tiACTION' OR EXPLORATION OPERATION Presentation Form GENERAL INFORMATION Inspection Date: 7/18/00 Operator: CITY OF WALSENBURG Commodity: S&G County: HUERFANO Specialist: JCS File No.: M-2000-092 WV~ ~a~c, Stu Landowner: CITY OF WALSENBURG Acres affected: ESTIMATED AT 0.9 ACRES Method of Mining: CONVENTIONAL WAS THIS CASE THE RESULT OF A ROUTINE INSPECTION? No OR COMPLAINT? Yes A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER WAS/WAS NOT ISSUED TO THE OPERATOR BECAUSE: The City was excavating material on its own property and, reportedly, transporting it to a City utility construction project. DIVISION'S~REASON FOR BRINGING THIS TO THE BOARD AS MINING WITHOUT A PERMIT VERSUS MINING OUTSIDE THE PERMIT BOUNDARY (DMG Policy -For any 110 type operation, if the operator affects greater than two acres, the operator shall be found for mining without a permit. For all other permitted operations, mining without a permit shall be determined on a case-by-case basis. Items to consider include the amount of disturbance, type of disturbance, ownership of the disturbed area, impact to the surrounding area due to the disturbance, degree of any health or safety hazard.) The operation in question has no permit nor waiver of one from the Board. NATURE OF UNPERMITTED (Construction Materials Extraction C.M.E. or Exploration Operation E.O.) Est. Acreage disturbed (Do no[ use for permitted sites) 0.9 Acres Est. Vol. Removed Unknown Est. Ac. outside permit boundary Not aoolicable SERIOUSNESS Operator conducted activity on own property? Yes , on others property? No Site activity, describe -The City had recently excavted and stockpiled material at the site. Area wide impacts, describe -Reportedly, material was transported from the site to a City utility construction project. Health or safety hazard, describe -