My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE27726
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE27726
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:35:15 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:42:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
6/28/1978
Doc Name
DOCKET DV 9-14-R APPLICATION FOR REVIEW NOV 79-V-1-12 ANSWER
Violation No.
TD1979040001012TV1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,.. .' • •, • ~ , n <br />9 (1 ~. )~1 11a5 nO ]Ilfpl-1'I;,f If~ll (~l" )'.nC~\:%1 t~fige re(i:.r fill n~~ 1)I^ <br />content of the USSS--a1~1~re;'ed i~]an and rl•_mands proof hf.r~~of io <br />the extent relevant. <br />5. a. It is aumiti-ed that z state permit is nat reouir~d. <br />b. Denied. OSA; has r,o infor.-mation or }:no\:'ledge by which <br />it can determine the i:ruth o.f SE.i's a]ic-gations and ~l^mands <br />proof thereof to the extent relevant at i_i.ial. <br />c. Denied. OSA; has no ].nierrration os- }:noh'7nr]Ue b}' ~:']lich <br />it can determine the truth of SEI's allec;ations and dcnlands <br />proof thereof to the e~:tent relevant at Lrial. <br />d. Dcn.ied. The IdcClane Canyon site is a surface cna.l <br />mining operation subject to 30 CFR 211 and 7:17. <br />e. Denied. Sediments wr-re tieing deposited in the d~-t~.inage <br />channel. <br />f. The size of the area i.n question is .innl%aLerial to the <br />existence of a violation, although it is re].evar,t to deter:mini.ng <br />the amount of penalty. OSM has no information or kno\r]~dne by <br />\ahich it can determine the truth of SEI's contention that the <br />pad was constructed in 1976, and therefore demands proof co <br />the extent relevant at trial. <br />SEI ' s F.ECUEST FOR FF'l~l E F <br />These requests represent l.eoal arguments to \:'hich an ?:r:swcr <br />is not required. Ho~'ever, the follo~.'ing resl'onses are made: <br />A.1. The operation 's not an e>:p.loration operation, <br />but rather a surface coal mining operation as defined i.n <br />§ 701(28) of the Act. <br />2. The Secretary is not esto}.~ped. The ar?option <br />of regulatory arrlendments on August 22, 1978 gave effect.ivc <br />notice to SEI of the legal char,ae in it= status. Further- <br />more, detailed notice wzs recently ~~ivcn by the USC:S <br />clarifying the current status of the operation. <br />B. SEI's claim that it tias usinc best technology <br />currentl;: available is stated as a legal conclusion <br />\ilthClUt supuorting factual 21]rc;a t.lGns or dGC U,pC ntailC.ir. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.