Laserfiche WebLink
• III IIIIIIIIIIIII III • <br /> STATE OF CO~ ORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />°F c°~ <br />Department of Natural Resources ,~~ <br /> <br />Nc~ <br />b <br />~ ~ O <br />1313 Sherman 6t., Roam 215 <br />Denver, C080203 ~ • ~ <br />c <br />~ ~ r <br />Phone: (703) 866-3567 e v <br />FAX: (303) 8328106 ~ Roy Romer <br /> Governor <br />September 1 <br />1993 <br />, M¢nae~B. LOng <br /> Division Direcbr <br />Dr. Ann Merest <br />RCG/Hagler, Bailly, Inc. <br />P.O. Drawer O <br />Boulder, CO 80306-1906 <br />RE: Follow-ups to my August 1, 1993 letter <br />Dear Dr. Merest: <br />This letter is to summarize our conversation of Augu~t 25 at the <br />Snowmass Convention and your later phone message to me, which I <br />received August 30. <br />Regarding the incomplete invoice: <br />I received, from Gail Bishop, expense receipts collects <br />31. I will not forward these to Alana Scott, as they <br />approved payment. What I still need is a written expla <br />clerical support. Your phone message indicated that RCG <br />the charges incurred for clerical support are ju: <br />unfortunately, I am not in a position to approve the i <br />phone message. If you will write out an explanation of <br />I will review and approve as appropriate. <br />Regarding your time spent on the project: <br />As explained, you have spent more time on the project I <br />billed. Provided the time spent is billable under the <br />should itemize it on the invoices and submit it for ps <br />certain that BMRI will raise the issue if they sense the <br />billable under the contract. As I explained in the lette <br />of time spent on the reports appears excessive, and as yoL <br />return, the nature of the review is such that the repo: <br />written in a cookbook fashion, that you are having to se <br />in detail to assure compliance with analytical s <br />procedures, and the time necessary to evaluate the la <br />greater than I had thought logical. Before I can approve <br />time spent on future reports, assuming it will take a simi <br />time, I will need to have a written explanation. <br />through May <br />have already <br />ation of the <br />HBI believes <br />ifiable but <br />voice from a <br />.here charges <br />han you have <br />ontract, you <br />Rnent . I am <br />time was not <br />~, the amount <br />explained in <br />is cannot be <br />rch the data <br />andards and <br />r results is <br />:he amount of <br />_ar amount of <br />