Laserfiche WebLink
r~ ~ <br />COLORADO DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />COAL PROGRAM <br />Civil Penalty Worksheet <br />I. Identification II. Action <br />Permittee(Operator Colowvo Coal Comoanv Penalty Assessed X Yes No <br />Permit No. C-81-019 Proposed Amount 52.250.00 <br />NOV/CO No. C-94-015 Source of Information or Assessment <br />Date of Issuance Julv 18. 1994 Operator/Permittee X Division X <br />Type of Violation <br />Administrative <br />Performance Std. X <br />Permit Condition X <br />III. Mandatory Penalties <br />N/A Cessation Order <br />N/A Failure to Abate 5750.00 - 55,000.00/day x days <br />N/A Mining without a Permit <br />IV. Penaltv Calculation Criteria -Rule 5.04.6 <br />Category Comments <br />A. History <br />0 NOVs past 12 months x 550.00 <br />0 COs past 12 months x S250.00 <br />B. Seriousness <br />Severe S1 500 51,750 <br />Significant 1 00 S1,250 <br />Low/Moderate 5250 S500 5750 <br />Insignificant SO <br />Administrative <br />C. Fault <br />While there's no evidence of actwl damage, this situation corotitutas <br />~e eignifirant variation from specific permitting provisiors, and <br />presents ^ significant potential for offshe discfterge of disturbed Brea <br />flows. <br />Intentional $1,000 S1 250 $1,500 This situation appears to ~rstitute intentiorol d'mregard Tor specific <br />Negligence $250 $500 $750 Permit provisioro (TR-261. Specific design parameters were d'ucussed <br />Unavoidable $Q and negotiated, yet the company chose to disregard said provisions. <br />The subject drairoge contrd plan was given deteAed scrutiny by both <br />the eompeny end the Division. Both the em'vonmental and <br />engineering statfe et Colawyo mrut have been aware of these <br />requ'vaments pr'wr to proceeding. <br />D. Number of Davs Penaltv Assessed 1 <br />E. Good Faith (May not e~cEed $1,250.00) <br />Credit - Extrat <br />Credit -Rapid <br />None granted at this time. <br />Total $2,250.00 <br />Assessment Officer <br />. Ber Date g 3 5`1 <br />Printed <br />