Laserfiche WebLink
of the Board' s finding that Plaintiffs received actual notice. <br /> This conclusion is further buttressed by the factual allegations <br /> contained in affidavits submitted by the Plaintiffs. In short, <br /> all factual matters submitted to the Court strongly mandate an, <br /> affirmance of the Board' s decision and dismissal of the Plain- <br /> tiffs' Complaint. <br /> IV. Conclusion. <br /> For the reasons Set forth above and in Defendants' <br /> earlier Memorandum Brief, Defendants William E. Nottingham, Jr. <br /> and Nottingham Sand and Gravel Company respectfully request that <br /> the Court deny Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, and <br /> dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint or, in the alternative, award <br /> Summary Judgment to the Defendants. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> CONOVER, McCLEARN, HEPPENSTALL <br /> & KEARNS, P.C . C <br /> B i <br /> C <br /> Micha 1 S . Carth No. 6688 <br /> 700 De er Club Bui ing <br /> 518 Seventeenth Stree <br /> Denver, Colorado 80202 <br /> (303) 292-9450 <br /> CERTIFICATE OF MAILING <br /> I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above <br /> Reply Brief of Defendants William E . Nottingham and <br /> Nottingham Sand & Gravel Company and Memorandum Brief in <br /> Opposition to Plaintiffs ' Motion for Summary Judgment was <br /> �- <br /> served on the zr day of Vt LyAk 1979, by placing <br /> same in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed <br /> i <br /> to: <br /> William P. Goldstein, Esq. <br /> Lamm & Schader <br /> 831 Pearl Street <br /> Boulder, Colorado 80302 <br /> William R. James, Esq. <br /> Assistant Attorney General <br /> Natural Resources Section <br /> 1515 Sherman Street, 3rd Floor <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> -13- <br />