My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE27372
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE27372
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:35:01 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:35:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/20/1993
Doc Name
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Violation No.
CV1993025
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT JUSTIFICATION <br />NOV C-93-025 <br />Assessment Conference Summary <br />Nov C-93-025 was issued by Susan Morrison of the Division for <br />"[F]ailure to include a description and detailed design for each <br />existing structure, for which there are specific design criteria or <br />performance standards, proposed to be used in connection with or to <br />facilitate the surface coal mining and reclamation operations". <br />The NOV referenced various berms, ditches, and culverts within <br />portions of the Edna Mine permit area for which specific designs or <br />descriptions were required, but had not been submitted. <br />For several of the structures, the Operator representatives <br />conceded that oversights occurred and the required designs had not <br />been provided. However, they indicated that designs for "Goat <br />Trail" access road culverts had been provided. Subsequent review <br />of Exhibit 3.5-1 (Sheet 2 of 2) and Table 3.5-3 has confirmed this <br />and the NOV will need to be modified. The Operator also argued <br />that the berm on the east side of the shop warehouse pad was an <br />MSHA required safety berm not required for drainage or materials <br />containment purposes, and the Division indicated that this would be <br />researched and the NOV modified if appropriate. The Operator <br />contended that the typical road ditch designs in the permit applied <br />to the "Goat Trail" access road as well as haul roads, but conceded <br />that this was not specified in the permit. <br />Fact of Violation <br />The Operator representatives conceded that required designs for <br />certain structures had not been provided. I find that a violation <br />did occur. <br />Civil Penalty Assessment <br />Proposed Penalty Assessment <br />History $ 0.00 <br />Seriousness 500.00 <br />Fault 250.00 <br />Good Faith 0.00 <br />Total $750.00 <br />History <br />The History component was not disputed. <br />Seriousness <br />The cited deficiencies were apparently permitting oversights. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.