My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-01-31_REVISION - M1986015
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1986015
>
2007-01-31_REVISION - M1986015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:42:24 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:35:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986015
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/31/2007
Doc Name
112c application
From
Continental Materials Corporation
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLAN <br />DISCUSSION: The permit area shown on Exhibit C-1(Amendment 3), encompasses a much <br />larger area than the area where the operation is designed to occur. The permit area extends a long ways to <br />the east and includes land that is under lease from Valco. However, just because [here is much more land <br />permitted to [he east does not mean anything can be done in [he way of mining that land. Although i[ is <br />permitted land i[ is not permitted affected land. The only land that can be affected within this large permit <br />area is in Phase 1 and Phase 2. Any work outside those areas would require an approved permit <br />amendment prior to disturbing the land. <br />It is important to note that prior to submitting this amendment, a portion of the original permit <br />area was removed. This included the batch plant area on Highway 50. Originally, it was thought that this <br />land might be used as a stockpile area for materials mined at this site. That never occurred. It turned out to <br />be far more convenient to stockpile on the processing plant area. Thus the 12 acres removed from the <br />permit includes only [he concrete batch plant and office facilities for [he company. Furthermore, the batch <br />plant can and sometimes does receive aggregates from other locations for use in producing the concrete. <br />In effect, the batch plan[ area is not actually a par[ of the mining operation and therefore it was concluded <br />that it should not be permitted. This change was approved in 2006. <br />AFFECTED LAND AREA: <br />Requirement: The Affected Land Boundary defines the limit of allowable disturbances within this <br />permit. <br />DISCUSSION: The Affected Land Boundary is the critical boundary that defines the edge of <br />the allowable disturbance area. This boundary not only includes [he mining area but any other land that <br />can be or is expected to be disturbed around [he mining area. No disturbance can extend beyond this <br />boundary. Of course, disturbing land beyond both the affected land boundary and the permit boundary is <br />clearly not allowed. In some areas in this permit [he permit boundary and affected land boundary are in <br />the same location, but where they are in different locations it is essential to recognize that the affected <br />land boundary defines where disturbance must stop; not the permit boundary. Thus, although it is <br />important to have permit boundaries located, it is essential that the affected land boundary be clearly <br />identified on the ground. <br />Requirement: The affected land boundary shall be defined on the ground and clearly marked prior <br />to initiation of operations. <br />DISCUSSION: Prior to [he star[ of clearing the land in Phase 2, [he affected land boundary <br />will be carefully defined on the ground and will be clearly marked. Where the vegetation is extremely <br />Pueblo East Pit Amendment 3 (2007) Exhibit D Page 12 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.