My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE27259
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE27259
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:34:56 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:33:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
11/22/1993
Doc Name
CERUELA CANYON CULVERT NOV C-93-070
From
BASIN RESOURCES INC
To
MLRD
Violation No.
CV1993070
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />14300 Highway 12 <br />Weston, Colorado 81091 <br />(719)868-2761 <br />FAX (719) 868-2275 <br />BASIN <br />RESOURCES, ~N~. <br />a subsidiary of ENTECH, Inc. <br />November 18, 1993 <br />Mr. Joseph Dudash <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203-2273 <br />RE: Ciruela Canyon Culvert, NOV C-93-070 <br />Dear Joe, <br />~~~~-„ . <br />-~•. - <br />NoV 22 1983 <br />p;.„,;,,, ~ .. <br />_ :~~ <br />The above referenced NOV was partially written for failure to <br />install a culvert under the railroad crossing in Ciruela Canyon <br />which is capable of passing the 100 year 24 hour storm event. <br />Apparently, CF&I made this commitment during the review and <br />approval process of the Ciruela Canyon diversion. <br />To comply with this requirement, the only options available <br />are to remove the railroad tracks and install a culvert capable of <br />passing the flow, or construct retention structures in the upper <br />drainage which would allow for routing the water through the <br />existing culvert. Both of these options would cause significant <br />environmental disturbance. <br />In review of this information, it is Basin's opinion that the <br />railroad crossing should not have been included in the diversion <br />design since it was an existing downstream structure and not part <br />of the channel which was relocated. Therefore, Basin requests that <br />the requirement to pass the 100 year 24 hour storm event through <br />this culvert be eliminated. Should you concur, Basin will revise <br />the permit document to remove the requirement. <br />If you have questions or need additional information <br />concerning this request, please do not hesitate to let me know. <br />Sincerely,- "~ <br />~R~ph~Lop z <br />Environmental Engineer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.