Laserfiche WebLink
G eU ir^~r d- Ssoc , <br />~ a fl ~. (~r <br />Carl <br /> <br />From: Jodi Villa [JVilla@Meur .com] ~ !"1~~¢ G wta~ ~ ~ e~~"',°' <br />Sent: Wednesday,Februa O8,2O0611:46AM ~,gq,,..d1!^ ~ ~~!~ <br />To: 'Mount, Carl' 9 `~Oj. <br />Subject: RE: DMG Permit Application (3811-DMG) ~ ~'v 1 ~ S~ <br />I guess I was referring to the bottom of the "Notice of Filing Application", <br />the form provided in the application package, where it states, <br />"Note to Applicant/Operator: You must attach a copy of the application form <br />to this notice." Is that just the application form, or all of the exhibits, <br />too? <br />Thanks for all of your quick responses to my numerous questions! <br />Jodi <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Mount, Carl [mailto:carl.mount@state.co.us] <br />Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 11:30 AM <br />To: 'Jodi Villa' <br />Subject: RE: DMG Permit Application (3811-DMG) <br />Rule 1.6.2 (1)(a) states: "Prior to submitting the application to the <br />Office, send a notice, on a form approved by the Board, to the local Board <br />of County Commissioners and, if the mining operation is within the <br />boundaries of a soil conservation district, to the Board of Supervisors of <br />the soil conservation district." Notice only. You must provide proof of <br />such notice with the application at the time the application is submitted to <br />the Office (that's us). Please read rule 1.6.2(1)(a) for complete applicant <br />procedures. <br />Carl <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Jodi Villa [mailto:JVi11a~Meurer.com] <br />Sent: Wednesday, February O8, 2006 11:30 AM <br />To: 'Mount, Carl' <br />Subject: RE: DMG Permit Application (3811-DMG) <br />Thanks, we will review this and then do one or the other First. <br />In the meantime, does the BOCC and Soils Conservation District get a copy of <br />the amendment application WITH all of the exhibits, or just the application <br />itself? <br />Thanks, <br />Jodi <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Mount, Carl [mailto:carl.mount~state.co.us] <br />Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 11:22 AM <br />To: 'Jodi Villa' <br />Subject: RE: DMG Permit Application (3811-DMG) <br />Succession of Operator (SO) process. Different from the amendment but can <br />run concurrently with approval from DMG. This makes it somewhat unclear and <br />confusing regarding who is running and responsible for the amendment so we <br />would prefer that you either do the SO first and then have the amendment run <br />1 <br />