My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE27119
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE27119
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:34:50 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:31:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981026
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
12/20/1994
Doc Name
CANADIAN STRIP MINE PN C-81-026 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS NOVS C-94-024 C-94-25 C-94-026 AND C-94-027
From
DMG
To
SLURCO CORP
Violation No.
CV1994025
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br />SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT JUSTIFICATION <br />NOV C-94-025 <br />Notice of Violation C-94-025 was issued for "Failure to submit Annual Hydrologic <br />Monitoring Data for well 7 in a timely manner. Submittal is required by October 31of each <br />year, and the 1993 report was not submitted until January 6, 1994". Dave Berry issued the <br />NOV from the office on September 29, 1994 to Slurco Corporation for the Canadian Strip <br />Mine. An assessment conference was held on December 5, 1994 with Dave Berry <br />representing the Division of Minerals and Geology and Jerry Koblitz representing Slurco <br />Corporation. <br />Dave Berry stated that Stipulation 1132 of the permit requires: <br />The Hydrologic monitoring plan will consist of monitoring the spoils well annually for <br />water level and to submit the results to the Division by October 31 of each year. <br />The 1993 report was submitted on January 6, 1994 and the 1992 report was submitted on <br />November 5, 1992. Dave Berry stated a minor administrative violation did occur. <br />Jerry KobGtz said as a general practice, the reports have been submitted late for about the <br />past ten years. No one has ever said anything about being late. The deadline does not allow <br />for the completion of the quarterly pond inspection reports which are included in the report. <br />Furthermore, the Division generally reviews the reports in January. He felt that the submittal <br />of the annual hydrologic report past an unrealistic deadline, and without Division review until <br />a couple months after the deadline does not constitute a violation. He requested that the <br />NOV be vacated. <br />I will uphold the NOV. A minor violation did occur. If the operator is concerned about <br />unrealistic deadlines, a revision should be requested to change the dates. <br />The proposed civil penalty was: <br />History $0.00 <br />Seriousness $0.00 <br />Fault $0.00 <br />Good Faith $0.00 <br />Total $0.00 <br />I agree with the proposed penalty. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.