My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-11-06_REVISION - M1991086
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1991086
>
1992-11-06_REVISION - M1991086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 10:32:50 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:30:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1991086
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/6/1992
Doc Name
EARL/HOFFMAN/REYER PIT 3 PN M90-087 ADEQUACY CONCERNS REGARDING PROPOSED TR 1
From
DMG
To
CARDER INC
Type & Sequence
AD1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br /> DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br /> OF'�O O Department of Natural Resources <br /> 1313 Sherman St..Room 215 , <br /> Denver,CO 80203 ••leis <br /> Phone:(303)866-3567 <br /> FAX:(303)832-6106 <br /> Rov Romer <br /> Governor <br /> November 6, 1992 Michael B.Long <br /> Division Director <br /> Ms . Sheila Nordyke <br /> Carder, Inc. <br /> P.O. Box 721 <br /> Lamar, CO 81052 <br /> RE: Earl-Hoffman-Reyer Pit #3 (Permit M-90-087) , Adequacy <br /> Concerns Regarding Proposed Technical Revision #1 <br /> Dear Ms . Nordyke: <br /> I have reviewed the proposed change in the permit area outline <br /> for the above referenced pit . I believe that this outline, if <br /> approved, would allow all of the permit area for this pit to be <br /> incorporated within the permit area for the Earl-Hoffman-Reyer <br /> Pit #3 (Permit M-91-086) as Carder, Inc . wishes . <br /> I have, however, one concern with approving this revised outline. <br /> That concern is with disturbance created by the operator within <br /> that area being eliminated from the 110 (2) permit area by this <br /> revision. If there was disturbance by mining or related activity <br /> in the area being removed from the 110 (2) permit outline, then it <br /> is the 112 permit area that should be revised and enlarged to <br /> encompass this disturbance. Please indicate whether the operator <br /> disturbed any part of the area proposed to be eliminated from the <br /> 110 (2) permit outline with mining or mining related activity. <br /> If you have any questions, please contact me. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> James C. Stevens <br /> Senior Reclamation Specialist <br /> JCS/er:z <br /> M: \OSS\ERN\M90087 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.