Laserfiche WebLink
2005-010), and failure to salvage and segregate topsoil (MV-2005-011). In four separate <br />orders, the Board assessed civil penalties in the amount of $11,100.00 for the three <br />violations MV-2005-009, MV-2005-010 and MV-2005-012, issued cease and desist orders <br />preventing further mining activities outside of the permitted boundaries and ordered the <br />Operator to undertake con•cctive actions within 180 days of the signed Board orders. <br />3. On June 14, 2005, the Operator requested from the Board, and received, an extension to <br />obtain a Section 112 reclamation permit for the entire site by November 17, 2005. On <br />November 17, 2005, the Operator requested from the Board, and received, an extension to <br />April 1, 2006 to convert its Section 110 reclamation permit into a Section 112 reclamation <br />permit. On February 16, 2006, the Operator requested from the Boazd, and received, an <br />extension to June 30, 2006. On June 14, 2006, the Operator requested, and received, an <br />extension to August 15, 2006 to convert its Section 110 reclamation permit into a Section <br />11 Z reclamation permit. The Operator now requests an extension of the due date to convert <br />its Section 110 reclamation permit into a Section 112 reclamation permit to December 15, <br />2006. <br />4. The Operator has paid the outstanding civil penalties assessed against it in prior Board <br />orders. <br />5. Section 34-32.5-124(6) of the Act states that the Board may suspend, modify or revoke a <br />permit if, following a hearing, the Board determines that a violation of a permit provision <br />has occurred. Section 24-4-106(4) of the Administrative Procedures Act authorizes <br />agencies conducting hearings to issue appropriate orders to control the subsequent course of <br />proceedings. <br />Colo. Marble Aug 06 Extension, M-1987-028 <br />