My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV17604
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV17604
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:29:16 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:26:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/25/1987
Doc Name
TRAPPER PERMIT REVISION NO 1 ADEQUACY COMMENTS ON 1987 OPERATIONS FN C-81-010
From
MLRD
To
GREGG SQUIRE
Type & Sequence
PR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.1A~~ <br />`~. <br />.~ • • III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />~~~°~9~Q STATE OF COLOR~L~v <br />Roy Romer, Govei <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SHELTON, Dlroctor <br />DATE: March 25, 1987 <br />T0: Gregg Squire <br />FROM: Jeff Deckler '~ <br />RE: TRAPPER PERMIT REVISION N0. O1, ADEQUACY COMMENTS ON 1987 <br />OPERATIONS, FILE N0. C-81-010 <br />I have reviewed the above referenced PR with respect to Topsoil and Bonding <br />issues. In addition, I have a philosophical comment. <br />I. Philosophy <br />This proposed revision presents a part of the total mine plan for the Colt and <br />Browning pits. As such I believe this revision should be incorporated into <br />PR2, and the complete mine plan reviewed at one time. Our job is to permit <br />coal mines, not topsoiling operations, and on the slim chance that the pit <br />wasn't approved, I would hate to think that they ripped up 96 acres for <br />nothing. In addition, many issues overlap in the two PR's, creating a piece <br />meal approach and duplication of effort. <br />II. Topsoil <br />The revision does not present any specific information with respect to soils <br />in the new pit areas. The operator's basic statement is that everything is <br />the same as in the original permit. This is not adequate. The operator must <br />provide information on stripping depths for each soil unit, total volume <br />stripped, and volumes placed in each proposed stockpile. These quantities are <br />necessary fora complete review of the plan, and for bonding calculations. <br />In addition, based on the current topsoil salvage problems, the operator must <br />verify the estimated stripping depths. As discussed more fully in my PR 02 <br />review, topsoil salvage depths at Trapper have been significantly different <br />than those estimated by the baseline soils inventory. Therefore, Trapper must <br />submit a material balance which shows that sufficient topsoil can be salvaged <br />to implement the reclamation plan. In addition, the Division reserves the <br />right to require Trapper to resample in order to verify the estimated <br />stripping depths for the new area. Additional information will also be <br />required for PR 02, including an explanation for this discrepancy. <br />Lastly, in overlaying the topsoil stripping and blasting maps, I noted that <br />some areas to be blasted will not have topsoil stripped. It is possible that <br />these areas are part of the existing pit and are therefore already disturbed. <br />Trapper should explain this apparent anomaly. <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.