My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE26800
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE26800
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:34:37 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:25:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981021
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/13/1991
Doc Name
TEN DAY LETTER TDL 91-02-244-8 BOURG STRIP MINE WALDEN COAL CO
From
OSM
To
MLRD
Violation No.
TD1991020244002TV1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~- . <br />iii iiiiiiiuiiiiiii <br />United States Department of the Interior <br />OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING <br />RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT ~~ ~ <br />SUITE 310 <br />625 SILVER AVENUE, S.W. In Rrpl~ Rrfr~ fo: <br />ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO 87102 <br />May 10, 1991 <br />~~~~Bod~ <br />MAY 1 3 1991 <br />Mr. Steven G. Renner, Coal Program Supervisor Mined Land <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division Reclamation Division <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />215 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Re: Ten-Day Letter (TDL) No. 91-02-244-2, Bourg Strip Mine, Walden Coal <br />Company <br />Dear Mr. Renner: <br />On May 7, 1991, the Albuquerque Field Office (AFO) received, via tele- <br />fax, the Mined Land Reclamation Division's (MEAD) request for an <br />informal review of AFO's April 29, 1991, written finding of an <br />inappropriate response by MLRD to the above-referenced TDL. <br />Included in MLRD's request for an informal review are copies of the <br />letter sent by MLRD to Walden Coal Company requesting that the company <br />amend its insurance certificate and the subsequent amended certificate <br />submitted by Walden Coal. Neither of these documents was made available <br />to AFO prior to the April 29, 1991, written finding rendered in this <br />case. <br />At the time AFO renders a written finding, in accordance with <br />30 CFR 842.11, regarding a State regulatory authority (RA) response to a <br />Ten-Day Notice or TDL, AFO must evaluate that information or <br />documentation made available by the RA for the record in each case. <br />This was the situation in [he case of TDL 91-02-244-2, <br />The April 11, 1991, MLRD response to the TDL stated that "the Division <br />will require Flatiron Companies dba Walden Coal Company furnish to the <br />Division a revised insurance certificate which includes a listing of the <br />Bourg Strip Mine by May 15, 1991." The AFO written finding of April 29, <br />1991, based on the record before AFO, indicated that simply listing <br />Bourg Strip as one of the operations covered by the certificate did not <br />ensure adequate coverage if multiple claims were made on the policy. <br />The letter instructing the company on how to revise the insurance <br />certificate was not made available for AFO review nor was there an <br />indication in MLRD's response that a written request for the revised <br />certificate had been made. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.