My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE26685
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE26685
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:34:32 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:23:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/25/1979
Doc Name
PENALTY MITIGATION INFORMATION PERTAINING TO OSM NOV 79-V-1-12
From
SHERIDAN ENTERPRISES INC
To
OSM
Violation No.
TD1979040001012TV1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Assessment Office <br />~, <br />' .Office of Surface Mining <br />May 17, 1979 <br />Page Two <br />The operation is an exploration activity being conducted by SEI <br />in accordance with its approved exploration plan. we have been <br />advised by legal counsel that Section 502(a) of the Surface Mining <br />Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 ("SMCRA") therefore does not <br />apply. Section 512 (a) of SMCRA makes it clear that exploration <br />operations on federal lands are not regulated by the Act. Instead, <br />exploration operations on federal lands are regulated in accordance <br />with the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 ("MLA"), as amended. Under <br />the regulations which implement the MLA, the USGS is given the <br />sole authority to regulate all facets of exploration operations <br />on federal land. <br />As stated above, the SEI activity is an exploration operation, <br />operating according to a valid approved exploration plan. For <br />this reason, the OSM inspector did not have jurisdiction to issue <br />this alleged violation. Therefore, no penalty should be assessed <br />for any of the violations discussed below. <br />During his inspection, the OSM inspector identified the following <br />alleged violations at the exploration site: <br />1. The first alleged violation was for "opening or developing <br />a site for surface coal mining operations (which include <br />underground mines) without a state permit, in violation of <br />30 USC ~ 502(a)." The operation at McClane Canyon is not <br />a mining operation; it is an exploration activity being <br />conducted with all the requirements of the effective USGS <br />approved exploration plan. This plan includes environmen- <br />tal and reclamation performance considerations designed to <br />control adverse environmental impacts. Since the OSM in- <br />spector did not have jurisdiction to issue this violation, <br />we urge you not to assess a penalty for the alleged viola- <br />tion. <br />2. The second alleged violation states that SEI failed "to <br />pass all surface drainage from (the) disturbed area through <br />a sediment pond." Once again, we would like to point out <br />that the operation at McClane Canyon is an exploration <br />operation and that, as a result, the OSM inspector lacked <br />the jurisdiction to issue this violation. _ <br />SEI normally maintains a siltation basin on the exploration <br />site. As evidence of this, we are submitting an inspection <br />report which shows that, on March 21, 1979, Fred Banta, an <br />inspector with the P1LR, visited the McClane Canyon explora- <br />tion site, and found a siltation basin in place (see Attach- <br />ment No. 1). On May 9, 1979, when the OSM inspector visited <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.