My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV17189
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV17189
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:28:44 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:22:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/19/2003
Doc Name
Adequacy Responses RN4/PR5
From
DMG
To
Trapper Mining Inc
Type & Sequence
RN4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303)832-8106 <br />June 19, 2003 <br />Mr. Forrest Luke <br />Trapper Mining, Inc. <br />P.O. BOX 187 <br />Craig, CO 81626 <br />Re: Trapper Mine, C-1981-010, RN04/PR-OS Review of May 28, 2003 Adequacy Responses <br />Deaz Mr. Luke: <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING~SAFETY <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Greg E. Walther <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Division Director <br />The Division has reviewed Trapper Mining, Int.'s responses to the Division's adequacy letter, dated <br />February 14, 2003. Trapper's responses were delivered to the Division on May 29, 2003. Remaining <br />concerns follow: <br />(d) Rule 4.08.2(1) requires that operators provide notice to owners of structures located within one- <br />halfmile of the permit boundary, at least 30 days prior to blasting, of their right to request apre-blast <br />survey. Should Trapper Mining, Inc. not posses copies of such notices sent to the owners of the <br />pipelines identified in proposed Table 3.4-2, we suggest Trapper Mining, Inc. provide, as an exhibit <br />in the DMG permit, copies of formalized agreements between the pipeline owners and Trapper that <br />were referenced in Trapper's responses dated May 28, 2003. If copies of these agreements cannot be <br />found, we suggest Trapper provide copies, again as an exhibit to the DMG permit, of any <br />correspondence indicating the pipeline owners' approval for relocating the pipelines. Copies of any <br />letters from the pipeline owners, indicating their satisfaction with the condition of the pipelines <br />following relocation, would also be important to add to the DMG permit. <br />Trapper Mining, Inc. indicated in its May 28, 32003 response that "Trapper will continue to closely <br />monitor potential blasting impacts to pipelines situated within and adjacent to the permit area." <br />Please provide for inclusion into the permit a description of this monitoring(visual, etc.) and the <br />frequency (weekly, etc.) at which this monitoring will occur. <br />After a telephone conversation with Trapper Mining on June 17, 2003, it is our understanding <br />that Trapper is currently negotiating with a contractor for airblast and ground vibration <br />monitoring. It is our understanding that the contract will describe the number and location of <br />monitoring stations, as well as the frequency with which monitoring will be conducted. Until the <br />Division determines that the monitoring plan is adequate to demonstrate regulatory compliance, <br />however. we must find this item unresolved at this time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.