My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE26311
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE26311
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:34:18 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:16:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
11/16/2001
Doc Name
NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMOUNT OF CIVIL PENALTY REQUEST FOR CONFERENCE NOV CV-2001-016
Violation No.
CV2001016
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COLORADO DfVISION OF MfNERALS AND GEOLOGY{PRIVATE } <br />Civil Penalty Worksheet <br />I. Identification <br />NOV No.: CV-200]-016 <br />Date Issued: November 16, 2001 <br />Mine: Lorencito Canyon Mine <br />PermitNo.: C-1996-084 <br />Operator/Permittee: Lorencito Coal Company, LLC <br />Type of Violation: <br />Administrative <br />X Performance Standard <br />Perini[ Condition <br />Il. Mandatory Penalties <br />Cessation Order <br />Failure to Abate - $750 to $5,000/day x days <br />Mining without a Permit <br />Ill. Penalri Calculation Criteria -Rule 5.04.6 <br />Source of Information or Assessment: X Operator/Permittee X Division <br />Category Comments <br />A. History <br />NOVs past 12 months x $50 <br />COs past 12 months x $250 <br />B. Seriousness <br />Severe $1,500 $1,750 <br />Significant $1,000 $1250 <br />Low/Moderate $250 $50 <br />Insignificant $0 <br />Administrative <br />C. Fault <br />Intentional <br />Negligence <br />Unavoidable <br />$1,000 $1,250 <br />$250 $500 <br />$0 <br />D. Number of Davs Penalty Assessed <br />E. Good Faith (May not exceed $1,250) <br />Credit -Extraordinary Effort ~, O <br />Credit -Rapid Compliance <br />There is no evidence of actual damage caused by the <br />blasting. However, the pre-blast survey is to be done <br />$750 prior [o blasting [o document pre-blast conditions. Blasting <br />prior to conducting the survey could result in <br />undocumented damage to the structures. <br />$1,500 The operator claims that poor communications prevented <br />$750 the operator from conducting the pre-blast survey. However, <br />it is the operators responsibility to establish effective lines <br />of communication with the consultants to allow sufficient <br />time [o complete [he requested pre-blast survey. With <br />respect to the Publication of Blasting Notice, the regulations <br />are very clear regarding the actions regarding publication. <br />The violation represents a high level of negligence. <br />Total $1,250.00 <br />7~-~"art-alt ~ L,~°~Lf'~,.r~/ Assessmen[Officer <br />~ignamre <br />Sandra L. Brown Dale December 24, 2001 <br />Name Printed C-NV-@ C199608e KAG 3001133a 1039Gfi AM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.