Laserfiche WebLink
iii ~uiiiiiiiiii iii <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman SI., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />FA%:303 832-8106 <br />DATE: May 24, 1990 <br />T0: Carl Mount <br />FROM: J.M. Clapton~j.~_, <br />RE: Seneca II, C-~~,,6//~0-005, Midterm Responses (TR-20) <br />of ~a~ <br />~_ ~ <br />ti <br />tiQ f ~9 <br />:~.~~f^ i8 <br />/B l6 ~ <br />Rov Romer, <br />Governor <br />Fretl R. eania. <br />Division Duenor <br />I have reviewed the Peabody responses to our adequacy questions, T11e <br />following numbering sequence is from the original letter to avoid confusion, <br />2k. Peabody proposes to make the Pecoco Pond a permanent structure. The pond <br />complies with Rule 4,05,9, The calculations on the pond in TR20 comply <br />with 100-year, 24-hour event parameters. <br />21. Peabody proposes to leave the ditch in place at present while the company <br />decides if to use it as a downdrain. This seems reasonable to me, <br />however, I am concerned that no date was submitted for this decision, I <br />believe that this decision should be made before fall so that regrading, <br />mulching and seeding can take place in a timely manner for spring <br />germination. <br />2m. Peabody's study of this situation and the setting of July 1, 1990 for a <br />decision is reasonable. I believe that this decision is a reasonable <br />response. (' <br />cE G N~' ~ 5 <br />7412E/scg <br />