My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE26236
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE26236
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:34:15 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:15:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981020
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
11/8/1994
Doc Name
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
From
DMG
To
GRAND VLY COAL CO
Violation No.
CV1994023
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT JUSTIFICATION <br />NOV C-94-023 <br />Notice of Violation C-94-023 was issued for "Failure to design <br />and construct sediment control measures to prevent additional <br />contributions of sediment to runoff outside the permit area". <br />Erica Crosby issued the NOV to Grand Valley Coal Company on <br />September 22, 1994 at the Munger Canyon Mine. An assessment <br />conference was held by phone on November 2, 1994. <br />The NOV applied to the fan area and a small portion of the <br />facilities area. A berm and silt fence were in place around the <br />fan serving as effective sediment control. However, there was no <br />mention of this small area exemption in the permit. At the <br />facilities area, an area approximately 200 square feet would not <br />drain into an approved small area exemption. There was no runoff <br />or evidence of any damage. Ms. Crosby said the NOV has been <br />abated. <br />Mr. John Walters, representing Grand Valley Coal Company (GVCC), <br />did not contest the fact of the violation or the proposed civil <br />penalty. He requested that a good faith reduction be considered <br />for rapid compliance and extraordinary effort in abating the NOV. <br />The abatement required GVCC to submit a Minor Revision by <br />September 30, 1994 and to implement the design by October 10, <br />1994. Mr. Walters explained that the necessary maps were <br />provided to Ms. Crosby during the inspection, before the NOV was <br />actually issued. The calculations were faxed to the DMG office <br />on September 23 and the hard copy was received by the DMG on <br />September 26, 1994. The design was implemented on October 6, <br />1994 upon notice of DMG approval. <br />The proposed civil penalty was: <br />History $0.00 <br />seriousness $0.00 <br />Fault $250.00 <br />Good Faith $0.00 <br />Total $250.00 <br />I agree with the seriousness and fault components. I am <br />recommending a $250.00 reduction for good faith. The operator <br />revised the mylar and printed three copies of the proposed <br />changes while the inspector was on site. The supporting <br />calculations were faxed the next day. As soon as the DMG <br />approved the revision, the operator installed the required <br />sediment control features. I conclude this represents <br />extraordinary effort and the shortest time possible. The NOV <br />could not have been abated any faster. <br />Settlement Agreement Penalty $0.00 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.