Laserfiche WebLink
9 <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br /> <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />a <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />1++ <br />15 <br />7.5 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />7.1 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />• • <br />fine. I }:now a fine is punitive in nature, and I thin}: before <br />you assess a fine in Item No. 6, you ought to hear what is <br />presented in Item No. ?; it may have some bearing on the extent <br />on the fine level in Item No. 6, because that is a repetitious <br />action. That is all. <br />f4 R. BARP.Y: I was under the impression from the <br />e,ay Joe presented it, that we were considering both of these. <br />r!R. ZAL}CIND: No, this is just for this one <br />~ agenda item. <br />hi P,. BAP,RY: You said "Bill P9alouff also };nown <br />as blalouff's Ili-Valley Pavi.ng." I assumed when you said that <br />that you were rall;ing about Items 6 and 7. <br />hIP.. ZALI<.IND: Just Item 6. Item 7 is a separate <br />operation, a separate site. And actually when we do consider <br />Item 7, I thin}: we will he underlining the cillfulness of the <br />operator. Rut I thin}; the two matters perhaps do need to be <br />considered separately; they are two wholly separate items. <br />Z'fIP, CiiilIPt°IAN: Do you feel that there is validity <br />in what he is saying? <br />it ". P.. ZAL}:IND: After }'ou hear Item No. 7, it will <br />underline the extent of the willfulness on the part of this <br />operator, his uncooperativeness. But it is a separate site, <br />a separate operation, yes, from Item No. 6. <br />1tR. IIOLDBP.: It's not to he a formal hearing? <br />Pd P.. ZALh.1.ND: It is not to be a formal hearing. <br />rll rep: L a xvr. crew .~ a.ccn~r a ns. r cr <br />CrrrrPo•J Slm rtlmnrl Nrpun,.• <br />1509 Cdrrn. Jlr Fnod <br />Lud,v nrr. (l Jum2r SOLI <br />i/i t~;n /.r;! <br />