Laserfiche WebLink
will be exceeded. Page 12-53 should note that there will be exceptions, and either list <br />those instances on Page 12-53 or include a reference to Page 13-44. <br />6. Previously approved pages in Tab 13 were numbered 13-1, 13-2, etc. Revised pages do <br />not have a Tab 13 prefix. In the interest of continuity, please revise the pages to include <br />the prefix. <br />7. Table 13-1, Seed Mix No. 1 -Species number 3 is listed as Agropyron spicatum inerme. <br />Agropyron spicatum is commonly known as bluebunch wheatgrass, while Agroovron <br />inerme is known by the common name of beardless wheatgrass. Which species does <br />PWCC plan to use in the seed mix? <br />8. As demonstrated by previous plantings of alfalfa (Medicag_ saliva), this species is very <br />competitive. PWCC proposed to include a different alfalfa species, Medicag_o falcata <br />in Seed Mix No. 1. We are unable to locate information regarding this species. Please <br />provide the Division with more information concerning the species, specifically <br />information to support that the species is less competitive. <br />9. Table 13-3, Seed Mix No. 3 - Medicag_o saliva. variety falcata is included in the mix. Is <br />"falcata" a species or variety? <br />10. PWCC proposes concentrated shrub plantings in corridors and localized topographies. <br />We agree that this can be a desirable method of shrub distribution. Exhibit 13-1 has <br />been revised to show the general distribution of the concentrated shrub planting areas. <br />Page 13-22 states that the areas shown on Exhibit 13-2 do not represent the acreage to <br />be established. If these acreages are not representative of the acreages to be <br />established, how will PWCC ensure that enough shrubs will be established to meet their <br />woody plant density success requirement? Please submit to the Division the total <br />acreage of concentrated shrub transplants so that we may verify that the success <br />requirement can be met. <br />11. A statement on revised page 13-27 states that PWCC 'will use 200 Ibs/acre of 18-46-0 <br />fertilizer." Is this application based on fertility analysis? If so, are the fertility needs <br />homogeneous throughout the area to be reclaimed? Is there a reason the fertilizer <br />recommendation is not site specific? Has PWCC had success applying nitrogen fertilizer <br />at the time of seeding? Through inspection at other mines, the Division has observed <br />that nitrogen application during the first year of seeding tends to encourage annual <br />species and gives little benefit to perennial species establishment. Has PWCC <br />successfully used this application? <br />12. Our Division and the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) disagree with the <br />proposed reduction in the woody plant density standard. Comments from the Division <br />of Wildlife are enclosed. CDOW contends that vast areas of primarily herbaceous <br />vegetation are not beneficial to wildlife. The Division agrees that establishing shrub <br />clumps and concentrated areas of shrubs is advantageous but believes PWCC should still <br />meet the 1000 sterns per acre standard overall. <br />ary en t 2 u y 13, 1 3 <br />