Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Steven G. Renner <br />2 <br />2 of 4 - The initial response from MLRD indicated that a letter to <br />the permittee would be sent requiring a revision to the permit that <br />would satisfy the demonstration requirement for small area <br />exemptions (SAE). The second response from MLRD included the <br />letter sent to the permittee. AFO has reviewed the document and <br />finds it to be appropriate. The timeframes specified for revising <br />the permit are within the timeframes established by INE-35. <br />3 of 4 - The initial response from MLRD requested an additional <br />10 days to evaluate the regulatory requirement in regard to <br />impoundments. The second response from MI.RD is also a request for <br />additional time and a request for additional clarification on the <br />issue. <br />The cited structures have been called sumps. The regulations do <br />not define or strictly address such features. The regulations do <br />distinguish between a small depression and an impoundment by <br />limiting the size of small depressions to one cubic yard of <br />impounded runoff. Comments on the restrictive size were received <br />and OSM responded, "Since a paragraph addressing impoundments is <br />now incorporated in the regulations, the limit remains appropriate <br />to distinguish between surface manipulations that assist with <br />revegetation and erosion control by impounding small amounts of <br />water in confined areas and those impoundments that may affect the <br />area and which must therefore receive special consideration by the <br />regulatory authority * * *" 42 Federal Register 62645. As a <br />primary concern though, one must consider the intended usage of <br />such a feature. The MI.RD regulation at Section 1.04(64) defines an <br />impoundment as a closed basin, either naturally formed or <br />artificially built, which is built to or does in fact retain water, <br />sediment, or slurried waste. Section 1.04(115) defines a <br />sedimentation pond as a primary sediment control structure. All of <br />the structures cited are the last sediment control structures that <br />disturbed area runoff will drain through prior to discharge onto an <br />undisturbed area or into the Purgatoire River. This section <br />continues on to further define sedimentation ponds as barriers, <br />dams, excavated depressions, etc., that slow down runoff water to <br />allow sediment to settle out. All of the structures cited were <br />constructed for that purpose. Three of the structures have designs <br />to show that the 10-year, 24-hour event will be completely <br />contained by the structure. The other two were constructed, with <br />apparent tacit approval by MLRD, because they are shown on location <br />maps but are not addressed in the permit narrative, at the <br />operators discretion in sizing, etc. These two structures, or <br />other sediment control structures in these locations, must be <br />specifically approved. The OSM inspector was told that the <br />structures have functioned to completely contain runoff events thus <br />far until the water evaporates. All five of the cited structures <br />fall under the definitions of impoundments and sedimentation ponds. <br />