Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />131 } tihcrm~n 51., Room ? 15 II~ <br />Denvcr, Colorado H1R03 <br />Phunc: (103) Hhfi 35h7 <br />FA%. 111111 H 11~H10h <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Rny Rnmer <br />SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT JUSTIFICATION covemnr <br />lamer S. Lochhead <br />Colorado Yampa Coal Company, Eckman Park Mine C-81-071, NOV CV-97-O12 E+cecut{ve oveoor <br />James B. McArdle, Conference Officer Michael H. Long <br />Divimon Onenor <br />The Notice of Violation CV-97-012 was issued for failure to conduct second quarter, 1997, pond <br />inspections as required by rule 4.05.6 (13) <br />Mr. Kent Gorham, of the Division of Minerals and Geology, presented testimony that quarterly <br />pond inspections were not performed as required by the regulations, specifically 4.05.6 (13). The <br />ponds had been sampled for water quality by Mr. Travis Rogers, who is also qualified to do the <br />quarterly pond inspections. The Division provided Colorado Yampa Coal Company with <br />additional time to provide the paperwork necessary to demonstrate that the sedimentation ponds <br />were inspected to the level required by the regulations. Of the 7 sedimentation ponds requiring <br />quarterly inspection, the two MSHA ponds did receive the required inspection as demonstrated in <br />the inspection reports which are required to be completed weekly. The rest of the ponds did not <br />have the necessary paper trail to demonstrate that adequate sediment pond inspections were <br />completed. <br />The Proposed civil penalty for NOV CV-97-012 was: <br />History $0.00 <br />Seriousness $1,000.00 <br />Fault $500.00 <br />Number of Days Penalty Assessed <br />Good Faith <br />$0.00 <br />Total Civil Penalty Proposed by the Assessment Officer was $1,500.00 <br />Mr. Rick Mills, of Colorado Yampa Coal Company, provided discussion regarding sediment <br />pond inspections and comments regarding inspections during periods of snow. Rick indicated <br />that the references to ice cover and snow cover during the water sampling was an indication that <br />the ponds were inspected to the extent possible. Travis is a registered P.E., qualified to do pond <br />inspections and the lack of specific details regarding sediment, erosion, structural weakness, <br />leaks, etc. was just an oversight. All ponds are visited weekly, 2 are MSHA ponds and the other <br />5 just get the NPDES monitoring. The MSHA pond inspections reports had sufficient detail to <br />demonstrate that the quarterly pond inspections were met. <br />