Laserfiche WebLink
Memo - H. Bruce Humphries - 2 - November 16, 1989 <br /> Concerns Submitted By Resolutions <br />1. Proposed CAP boundaries are Cedar Heights Lenders, Castle Concrete's reclamation will be <br /> larger than actual disturbances and Mansfield Development limited to existing disturbances. New <br /> approval of such may allow Castle Corp., Grea M. Nagel disturbances will be created only to <br /> Concrete to disturb new, undisturbed satisfy slope stability problems, to <br /> areas during reclamation operations. realign the road and install the silt <br /> retention facility, and to install <br /> culverts and riprap. <br />2. Approval of CAP boundaries as permit Cedar Heights Lenders, All disturbances within the CAP <br /> boundaries will allow Castle Concrete Mansfield Development boundaries will be for reclamation <br /> to mine in new areas, some of which Corp. and slope stabilization only, except <br /> have not been approved for access by for the road realignment and silt <br /> owners. Also, if these areas are retention facility being constructed <br /> approved as new permit areas, and Castle facility being constructed to address <br /> Concrete dumps more material at these areas, excess sedimentation. Offsite areas <br /> this additional dumping would not be may include area within the permit <br /> considered an off site impact. boundary but outside the affected <br /> area. <br /> • <br />3. Repaired access road slopes should be Cedar Heights Lenders, Proposed factor of safety of 1.3 for <br /> designed with a factor of safety Greg M. Naoel remedial action is appropriate for <br /> exceeding 1.5. Area 2 and 3 slides non-load-bearing slopes. The <br /> not be left at 1.3:1 and 1.8:1, as Division has asked Castle Concrete <br /> slopes steeper than 2:1 are unstable. to grade the Area 2 and 3 slides <br /> to 2:1. <br />