My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996-10-15_REVISION - M1981302
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981302
>
1996-10-15_REVISION - M1981302
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2022 3:57:07 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:08:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981302
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/15/1996
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO FAX OF 9-18-96 FOR NSA TO DMG DEEPE FARM PIT WESTERN MOBILE PERMIT M-81-302
From
DMG
To
NATURAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES INC
Type & Sequence
TR5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> ' � � III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • �; `.� <br /> 999 �i t OF COLORADO <br /> DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br /> 1 313 Sh enl of St., o Ke21 Jrces <br /> 1313 Sherman St., Room 215 , <br /> Denver,Colorado 80203 <br /> Phone:(303)866 3567 <br /> FAX (303)lH I-8106 <br /> DEPARTMENT OF <br /> NATURAL <br /> October 15, 1996 RESOURCES <br /> Roy Romer <br /> Ms. Jane E. Bunin, PhD Gove.no, <br /> Natural Science Associates, Inc. James S.lochhead <br /> 4814 W. Moorhead Cir. EzecuSve Direcmr <br /> Boulder, Co 80303 <br /> Michael B.Lang <br /> Division Dneaor <br /> RE: Response to FAX of 9-18-96 from NSA to DMG, Deepe Farm Pit, Western Mobile, <br /> Permit M-81-302. <br /> Dear Dr. Bunin: <br /> Thank you for writing the Division of Minerals and Geology (DMG) and the Mined Land <br /> Reclamation Board with you concerns regarding the Deepe Farm Pit. I would like to <br /> address those issues in this letter. <br /> The DMG believes that the average minimum topsoil depths over the area sampled do <br /> meet the minimum permit standards. The permit stated that topsoil would be <br /> redistributed over graded areas to 6-8 inches in thickness. Even though 3 of the <br /> 6 test pits were found to have less than the minimum thickness, on the average, the <br /> minimum thickness of topsoil has been applied. More importantly, the operator will <br /> be required to establish a diverse, effective, and long-lasting vegetative cover <br /> that is capable of self-regeneration and is at least equal, with respect to the <br /> extent of cover, to the natural vegetation of the surrounding area. Until that is <br /> done, the reclamation bond cannot be released in its entirety. <br /> The DMG thinks that the concern related to the embankment is not within our <br /> jurisdiction and, given the end land use of pasture and wildlife habitat, is a moot <br /> point anyway. The reason that the DMG does not have jurisdiction is that, if the <br /> embankment were to fail, it would not drastically affect the presently stated end <br /> land use of the parcel of land covered by the permit. If the permit has not been <br /> released and the end land use were changed at a later date to one where failure of <br /> the embankment would affect uses that were protected by the embankment, then the DMG <br /> would require an assessment of the embankment to assure that it would act to <br /> reasonably protect the stated end land use or uses. <br /> I hope that this addresses your stated concerns. Please contact me in writing or <br /> by phone with any other questions. <br /> S' cere , <br /> Cad Carl B.B. Mount <br /> Senior Environmental Protection Specialist <br /> cc: John Hickman, Western Mobile w/ enclosure <br /> Ed McDowell, Flatiron Companies w/ enclosure <br /> Ron Cattany, Executive Director's Office, DNR <br /> Michael Long, Director, DMG <br /> H. Bruce Humphries, DMG <br /> J Gregg Squire, DMG <br /> C: M81302JB.LET <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.