Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Wert Elk Mine <br />mining in the B seam are included and are based on data and evaluations of the F se: <br />subsidence, as well as current industry data for the mining methods employed. <br />A subsidence monitoring plan to monitor mining in the B seam for the 5-year permit a: <br />is included in Exhibit 60. The monitoring plan will provide additional data which wl <br />coupled with the F seam data and can be utilized for future mine planning consideratic <br />The effect ofmining-induced subsidence on renewable resources, structures, and geologic. <br />unstable areas in the 5-year permit area is discussed in a report entitled Subside <br />Evaluation for West Elk Mine. This report is included in this Mining and Reclamation F <br />as Exhibit 55. A limited mining buffer zone has been designed to protect the Dry Fork <br />is included as Appendix B to Exhibit 55 and is shown on Map 50. <br />Until approved by CMLRD, Mountain Coal Company will not mine under or adjacer. <br />any perennial streams. Additionally, there exists on or near the property no aquifers <br />supply any public water system or any public buildings as described in CMLRD's Reeulat <br />for Coal Minine. All surface owners will be notified by mail at least six months pric <br />minin; beneath their property. i <br />Mining will not approach the two perennial streams-South Prong and Ecorse Creek- <br />25 to 35 years into the mine life. These streams will be protected, at a minimum, by b <br />zones similar to that designed for the Dry Fork. <br />A crack reported by Duntvd (2976, p. 14) to be 1.5 feet wide and 515 feet above the <br />workings at a site approximately 3 miles from the proposed site occurs at 485 fe <br />overburden thickness, with a greater concentration of cracks at or below the 40( <br />thickness. With one exception all cracks shown in Dunrud's figure 14 occur when <br />overburden is less than 500 feet thick. The principal areas of sub-500 foot cover at Wee <br />are near the outcrop and under the Dry Fork of Minnesota Creek These areas w <br />adequately protected by pillars shown in the mine layout. The mine cited by Dunru <br />page 14) is situated in a different seam in an area cut off from the Mountain Coal Con <br />property by the North Fork of the Gunnison River. Dunrud's study contains n <br />to/measurements of strata on the south side of the river. Geologic features such as <br />cited in Dunrud's p.13, are not common in the Bear Mine. In any event, Dunrud's "c <br />was a superficial tension crack which is probably of limited vertical extent, say 3 or <br />Dunrud presents no data to define vertical extent. On pages 16 and 17, Dunrud recol <br />the "healing" properties of the clayey soil and colluvium and erasion of surficial subsi <br />effects. ~ <br />l <br />2.05-147 <br />