My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE25699
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE25699
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:33:56 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:06:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981047
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
8/8/1985
Doc Name
RECOMMENDED VACATION OF NOV C-85-056
From
MLRD
To
DIRECTOR
Violation No.
CV1985056
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Richard D. Lamm <br />Governor <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />David H. Gelches, Execulrve Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DI\ <br />DAVID C'SHELTON, Director <br />DATE: August 8, 1985 <br />T0: David C. Shelton, Director <br />FROM: James A. Pendleton, Conference Officer <br />RE: Recommended Vacation of N.O.V. C-8 56 <br />An assessment conference was convened at the request of Powderhorn Coal <br />Company to consider N.O.V. C-85-056, issued to Blue Ribbon Coal Company. Both <br />Blue Ribbon Coal Company and Powderhorn Coal Company are subsidiaries of <br />Western Associates. Blue Ribbon Coal Company was represented by Henry Barbe, <br />James Stover and Richard Fanyo, attorney. Bob Liddle represented the Division. <br />Bob Liddle summarized the Division's issuance of this administrative Notice of <br />Violation for "failure to submit annual hydrologic reports in accordance with <br />permit approval." Richard Fanyo observed that no submittal date for the <br />report is specified with in permit documents. In this specific situation no <br />policy exists with which to clarify the submittal date. No warnings were <br />issued prior to the issuance of this violation. <br />Candidly, it is my opinion that the submittal date would be unenforceable in <br />this specific situation. Either the permit documents should be amended by the <br />Division to impose a specific due date for the report, or a general policy <br />should be issued by the Division to all operators regarding unspecified <br />submittal dates for periodic reports and inspections. <br />However, failing a specific enforceable date or a general existing policy <br />regarding unspecified due dates, I recommend that the Division vacate <br />N.O.V. C-85-056, because it is unenforceable. <br />JAP/ddt <br />cc: Enforcement File for N.O.V. C-85-056 <br />Fred Banta <br />Bob Liddle <br />Susan Mowry <br />Richard Fanyo <br />2522E <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.