Laserfiche WebLink
Proposed Civil Penalty Assessment <br />Seneca Coal Company/The Seneca H Mine <br />NOV CV-2003-005 <br />July 7, 2003 <br />Materials reviewed: DMG Inspection Form (6/10/03-6/1 l/03); DMG NOV Form (6/17/03). Comments <br />from the permittee were not submitted. <br />History [Rule 5.04.5(3)(a)]: <br />No NOV s have been issued to this mine within the 12 month period preceding the issuance date <br />(6/ 17/03} of this NOV. <br />The History component is therefore proposed to be set at $0. <br />Seriousness [Rule 5.045(3)(b)]: <br />The Seriousness component of a proposed assessment may range from $0 to $1750. The amount <br />proposed depends upon whether the violation was one of performance requirements or of <br />administrative requirements, This NOV was written for a violation of performance requirements. <br />In the case of a violation of performance requirements, the amount to be assessed for Seriousness <br />depends upon (1) the probability of the occurcence of the event which a violated standard is <br />designed to prevent, and (2) the duration and extent of the potential or actual damage in terms of <br />area and impact on the public or environment. <br />(1) Events that cited performance standards are designed to prevent did in fact occur. Failing to <br />re-topsoil and re-seed disturbed areas in accordance with the approved schedule resulted in <br />excessive erosion, loss of topsoil resource, and sedimentation onto adjacent revege[ated areas. <br />(2) The duration of the NOV appears to have been quite high (Oct 2002 -July 2003). While the <br />impact upon the public appears low, [he areal extent of the NOV appears high (over 83.53 <br />acres of topsoiled disturbance went unseeded; an additional 24.48 acres of disturbance went <br />untopsoiled and unseeded; an additional acre was affected by erosional sediment deposition). <br />The Seriousness component o(this assessment is therefore proposed to be set at $1000. <br />Fault [Rule 5.045(3)(c)]: <br />The fault component of a proposed civil penalty assessment may range from $0 to $1500. <br />Assessments of"unavoidable" violations may range from $0 to $250. Assessments for violations <br />that were the result of"negligence" may range from $250 to $750. Assessments for violations that <br />resulted from "intentional conduct" may range from $750 to $1500. <br />The perrnittee is now several months behind its reclamation schedule approved via TR-34 in <br />October 2002. This NOV thus appears to be [he result of a high degree of negligence. <br />The Fault component is therefore proposed to be set at $750. <br />Good Faith in Achieving Compliance [Rule 5.04.5(3)(d)]: <br />This NOV has not yet been fully abated. <br />Good faith credit is therefore not proposed at this time. <br />The Total Proposed Civil Penalty Assessment for this NOV is therefore set at $1750. <br />