My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV15111
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV15111
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:26:22 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:01:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/19/2002
Doc Name
FS Review & EA
From
Forest Service Paonia Ranger District
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR23
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />shows that this alternative would result in'eonstruction of about 5.4•~miles of new <br />temporary road, improvement of about 1.8 miles of existing roads, and about 0.25'°miles <br />of spot trail improvement in Hubbard Canyon (EA, Section 3.1.2), and includes about 3~ <br />-acres of disturbance for drill pads: The analysis shows that activities associated with this <br />alternative would impart minor decreases in elk habitat effectiveness but these decreases <br />would remain within Forest Plan standazds, and the minimal disturbance would will not <br />effect the habitat capability for other species (EA, page 3-17). Further, the analysis <br />shows that there is potential for short-term sedimentation to effect aquatic species, but <br />that these effects could easily be mitigated (EA, page 3-18). The effects to riparian <br />habitat, especially in Hubbard Canyon, were also found to be minimal given the short <br />duration of use in the area and the minimal disturbance proposed (EA, page 3-19). The <br />analysis also shows that the activities are unlikely to disrupt the natural riparian <br />mechanism as long as mitigation measures are implemented (EA, page 3-19). The <br />analysis shows only small scale impacts to visual quality (EA, page 3-30 and 3-36), <br />minimal impacts to surface and ground water resources (EA, page 3-35), and low <br />potential for soil erosion (page 3-45). <br />"'With specific regazd to allowing a helicopter hole (IP99-3) in Hubbazd Canyon with ATV <br />access, allowing this activity allows BRL to further understand the coal reserves in the <br />area, and affords the Forest Service the opportunity to implement trail improvements in <br />Hubbazd Canyon, so that the trail can be made safe for the intended uses of the trail. <br />A` The analysis in ffie EA shows that the impacts in Hubbazd Canyon aze expected to be <br />minimal. About 0.25 mile of spot trail construction would be needed to afford safe <br />access to IP99-3 (EA, Section 2.2), this improvement would occur along the former road <br />prism (EA, page 3-35) and would be made along the existing Hubbard Canyon trail <br />alignment, some of which already lies within azea defined as being within the riparian <br />zone (EA, page 3-3 and Figure 3-2). The spot trail improvement will not appreciable <br />degrade the riparian habitat in Hubbard Canyon. Improvement of the trail would in turn <br />provide a safe trail for other Forest users and reduce potential resource impacts with <br />installation of erosion control devices in the trail(EA, page 3-27). Hubbard Canyon has <br />been a place of historical use (the former road was the primary access route to the Forest, <br />EA, page 3-3) and natural activity has modified the landscape in the canyon (EA, Section <br />3.7.1). The canyon has absorbed impacts from the past activities, and the minimal <br />disturbance associated proposed for the drilling and trail upgrade will not appreciably <br />alter the existing landscape. <br />The level area-sited for the location of Hole IP99-3 reduces the risk for erosion potential <br />(EA, page 3-35) and is in an area of low to medium soil erosion potential (EA, page 3- <br />45). There also is minimal risk for new rockfalls or geologic hazazds (EA, page 3-46). <br />Further, the CDOW considers Hubbard Creek a poor fishery (EA, page 3-27). The <br />analysis in the EA shows very little risk to resources in Hubbard Canyon including the <br />drilling of 1P99-3. The Forest Service is imposing extraordinary mitigation measures at <br />this site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.