REV15111 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

November 13, 2001 meeting of the NFCWG. In response to public request, the GMUG extended the comment period until December 1, 2001. Twelve parties commented on the EA, input from these parties is attached to this document as Appendix C. The Response to Comments is contained in Appendix D of this document. VI. FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Based on my review of the EA and supporting project record, I have determined that this decision does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, as defined in the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 Part 1508, section 27 (40 CFR 1508.27) in either context or intensity. Context Locali .Implications of this decision would temporarily affect about 31 acres of land on the Paonia Ranger District. Required reclamation of drill pads and new temporary road construction alleviate long-term impacts to the land. The effects on public land and users over the long term would remain consistent with that which is presently occurring (EA, Chapter 3}. Affected Interests. Affected interests for this project are primarily recreationists, other permittees in the project area, and parties with on-going concerns regarding coal mining in the North Fork Valley. Affected Re~on• This decision is for site-specific actions with impacts in the local area. The context of this decision is typical of other coal projdcts on the Paonia District of the GMUG, and would not measurably affect the region. Society. No adverse effects are expected on society as a whole. Intensi 1. Consideration Of Beneficial And Adverse Imnac[s. Consideration of beneficial and adverse impacts has been made in the EA (Chapter 3). Impacts of this decision will be similaz to that of previous decisions regarding coal exploration drilling, GVB installation and associated access needs. Although both beneficial and adverse effects are disclosed, none are severe enough to be considered significant. 2. Consideration of Public Health And Safety. Public health and safety issues pertaining to public safety on roads to be shared with drill traffic (EA, Section 3.1) and safety of underground miners (EA, Section 1.2 and 3.9) were considered in the EA. 3. Consideration of Unique Characteristics Such As Proximity To Historic Or Cultural Resources, Pazk Lands, Prime Farmlands, Wetlands, Wild and Scenic Rivers, Or Ecologically Critical Areas. Historic and cultural resources are addressed in the 9