Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />__ scuare hard. Th_ coherency of the treated surface of the different test <br />,____ ::as cc-.paratively evaluated by using air and cater jets to simulate wind <br />~-._ .. :_~Sr crC510.^~. THE reage^.t s, which •,,a rigid in cos: from $0.20 to $3.15 per <br />____.-, .. __= diluted i:ith ':arcing quantities of water and applied in differing <br />qusn__ic-s to approximate reagent costs of 1, 2, and 4 cents per square yard. <br />,_ = __.-.~_ _~ scuare yarc, tha reagent test would be $153.60 per acre and <br />therefore nEar the upper limit, if total costs including application are to be <br />held =_ ;2~~ per acre. <br />:;11 of the chemicals tested--cationic neoprene emulsion, Coherex, Com- <br />pound SP-G00, DCA-i0, Rezosol, and Soil Gard--produced wind- and water- <br />rrsis-_act surfaces on sandy, slimy, and combined tailings plots when applied <br />ir. ;uantities costing 4 cents per square yard. As the amount applied was <br />decreased to the 1-cent-per-square-yard basis, only Coherex remained as a <br />viabie reagent on the different types of plots. <br />Combined Chemical-Vegetative Stabilization <br />The use of prope*_ che~:.icals in conjunction with vegetative growth can <br />have several advantages. ThE chemical can be of benefit by (1) preventing <br />sandblasting of the plants, (2) retaining moisture in the tailings by decreas- <br />ing evaporation, (3) aiding in gemination, when dark in color, by absorbing <br />heat, (!) adding organics, (S) reducing reflection of the sun's rays back on'_o <br />the rlants, and (6) providing better structure. Of the six elastomeric poly- <br />mers tested, only three t:•ere selected for intensive testing with the combina- <br />tioR chemical-vegetative mecfiod. These three--Coherex, Compaund SP-400, and <br />Seil Gard--were selected primarily on a basis of cost. <br />Zr.door and outdoor test plots, stabilized with the three chemicals at <br />costs of 1 and 2 cents per scuare yard, were compared with control plats <br />planted and treated in the same way except that no chemicals were used. Each <br />plot was planted with aIfaifa, wheatgrasses, sweet clover, barley, rabbit <br />brush, sagebrush, and Marglobe tomatoes. Coherex and Soil Gard, under most of <br />the conditions tested, increased the germination rate of the seeds over the <br />control plots, a:hereas Compound SP-400 tended to hinder germination. Surviv2l <br />rates of the germinated plants on the plots treated with Coherex and Soil Gard <br />were comparable to those of plants on the control plots, demonstrating that, <br />Cohen considering the better germination obtained by using the chemicals <br />coupled with_e~cual plant survival, [he chemically treated lots had <br />advantages,_:Coharex produced better results at a Lower cost than Soil Gard <br />~.`_ __~ <br />and c;as selec ed for the field testing at McGill <br />FIELD TESTING <br />The selected system of a combined vegetation planting stabilized by a <br />~`a-.'__al additive was ap?lied to a 10-acre plot of Kennecott's i4cGill, i(eV,, <br />_~__:-_<_ in mid-Seotanber 1551. Seeds appropriate to the area together with <br />--_ rater:-predetermined ar.~c~.;,nts nd types of fertilizers were planted using a <br />_____ __,de.. .'he entiLE planted area then was sprayed with Coherex to bond <br />_:.a =.._fac~. ~~d pra•.er,t ._r.d Erosion. 2 careful account was kept of the <br />z-..cr.= r_f c.,_rr:icals, labor, and time expended on stabilizing the plot. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />-e <br />~: <br />_« <br /> <br />_ < '~ <br />