Laserfiche WebLink
1<<ilirirl~~ri~~i~i <br />~nite~ ~tate~s senate <br />WASHINGTON, DC 20510 <br />September 27, 1994 <br />The Honorable Bruce Babbitt <br />Secretary <br />Department of the Interior <br />1849 C Street, N.W. <br />Washington, D.C. 20240 <br />Dear Mr. Secretary: <br />We are writing to support the recent actions of the State of <br />Colorado regarding Kerr Coal Company•s (Kerr) reclamation project <br />near Walden, Colorado. The situation involving Kerr and the <br />Office of Surface Mining (OSM) has prompted Governor Roy Romer to <br />request that you assume jurisdiction of the situation under 43 <br />C.F.R. Part 4.5 to conduct an independent review of the case and <br />issue a final decision. <br />The Kerr reclamation was completed in accordance with a plan <br />approved by the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (DMG) <br />in 1993. The reclamation project won a state reclamation award <br />that was presented to Kerr by OSM Director Bob Uram while on a <br />trip to Colorado (copy attached). <br />OSM claims that 1200 feet of the 1.9 mile mine site does not meet <br />the approximate original contour of the land involved. DMG has <br />certified the reclamation based on the amount of fill material <br />available on a truncated mine life. OSM, in spite of the fact <br />that it was informed of the reclamation progress on a monthly <br />basis from the beginning of reclamation in 1990 and registered no <br />complaints, chose to issue a Notice of Violation following <br />completion of the land reclamation. Another Interior agency, the <br />Bureau of Land Management, has stated that the productivity of <br />the land following the post-mining reclamation is superior to the <br />pre-mining productivity. <br />The legal issue involved is where the primary enforcement <br />authority over reclamation projects lies. Federal law clearly <br />places primary authority with the states unless there is imminent <br />environmental danger. In the Kerr case, OSM, by its own <br />admission concedes there is no danger of imminent environmental <br />harm or risk to public safety. Further, OSM did not comply with <br />Federal law by notifying the State of Colorado ten days in <br />advance of issuing the Notice of Violation. <br />