Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7. SUMMARIZE <br />'(~ blUl~la~ <br />A. ~RfE BELIEVE THAT THESE PARTICULAR <br />ROADS (REFER TO MAP AND PICTURES) FALL <br />WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE REGULATIONS <br />AND SHOULD BE PERMITTED. <br />Q ~~SI~D~ <br />I ~" ARGUMENTS PRESENTED BY MCC ~~C W I ~ ~ S f ~k 1" L~ <br />BE BRIEF!! ~ fCl~` <br />1. THE ROAD AT THE REFUSE PILE IS A CONSTRUCTION ROAD <br />AND THEREFORE EXEMPT FROM THESE REQUIREMENTS <br />i~j~~1 <br />A. UNDER THE ROAD DEFINITION, A CONSTRUCTION <br />ROADWAY WHICH IS USED FOR PART OF THE ROAD <br />CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE IS PROMPTLY <br />REPLACED BY A HAUL ROAD, ACCESSROAD, OR LiGHT- <br />USE ROAD LOCATED IN THE IDENTICAL RIGHT OF WAY I <br />AS THE CONSTRUCTION ROADWAY, IS EXEMPT~~ e -V10~ d Odd <br />/V~lSubjc~Lly c~.pj. <br />FOR EXAMPLE: THE DEFINITION EXCLUDES ANY <br />ROADWAY WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE IMMEDIATE <br />MINING PIT AREA (ON A SURFACE MINE). WOULD ALSO <br />EXCLUDE A ROAD ONTO A REFUSE PILE OR A ROAD <br />ASSOCIATED WITH A COAL STOCKPILE. THE LOCATION <br />CHANGESCONSTANTLY AND ISEVENTUALLY REMOVED. <br />THIS MAY HAVE BEEN THE ORIGINAL INTENT ON FOR <br />THIS ROAD [ i~Yt~e~ ~ 11~,~ p~ i.e 2 {'/p. Wd S S U vh r~~~~ /v. d''d'S <br />b-vl ~ ato a rv /c ~ ~ yr ~-S'~ , <br />OPINION: ~~~ ONSTRUCTION ROADWAYS LrC BE <br />REPLACE IMMEDIATELY WITH ANOTHER ROAD; <br />HIS DOESARGUMENT DOESNOT APPLY TO <br />THIS SITUATION BECAUSE: <br />