My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE25154
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE25154
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:33:38 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:55:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982055
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Name
COAL PROCESSING WASTE AND NON-COAL PROCESSING WASTE
Violation No.
CV1993084
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_ 4. Stability: The revised design oP the reluse diepoeal area <br />included a stability analysis utilizing the same methods and <br />h>. ` ` <br />``'"~ references that were used in the initial design, except that <br />actual physical properties of the refuse material, based upon <br />testing conducted eazly is the mine life, were utilized. The <br />calculated !actor of safety !or the revised reluse disposal <br />embaaloneat utilizing actual physical parameters of the refuse <br />material is 2.45. Like is the initial design, a sensitivity <br />analysis rae conducted by vazying cohesions, internal angles <br />of friction, and the overall slope of the embanl®ent. The <br />sensitivity analysis resulted in factors of safety ranging <br />from 1.55 to 2.45, indicating that all possible variations <br />and conditions for the design would result in a factor of <br />safety greater than the required 1.5. <br />The Division approved the modified refuse diepoeal area design <br />with three stipulations, none of which were satiaiied by the <br />previous operator. <br />,,.;': , <br />,~~y~. Flaws in Previous Deaisrna <br />During early 1987, Energy Fuels 1[ining Company acquired the <br />Raton creek Mine project from the previous operator. Haeed on <br />observations of the then existing refuse diepoeal area, it wan <br />evident that modifications were necessary in order to improve the <br />operational feasibility of embanltaent construction, drainage <br />control, reclamation feasibility, sad to match the refuse <br />disposal design volume with that which ie expected to be gener- <br />ated during the nine life. The following is a list of design <br />flaws which were identified in the initial and revised designs <br />and which are bsina corrected in the design presented here: <br />1. The volume of refuse diepoeal contemplated in the 1983 <br />modified design is approximately 4 million cubic yards, tour <br />times greater than that which is necessary. ', <br />1 . <br />~~" <br />- 48b <br />Revised 5/93 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.