Laserfiche WebLink
<br />iii iiiiiiiiiiiii-iii <br />999 <br />~'- ~ STATE 0~= COLORADO <br />June 5, 2001 <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St.. Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone. 1303) 866-356? <br />FAX: (3011 83 2-81 06 <br />Michael S. Savage <br />Savage and Savage <br />464 West Sumac Court <br />Louisville, CO 80027-2227 <br />Re: Second Adequacy Review, Oakridge Energy, Inc., The Carbon Junction Mine, <br />DMG Permit No. C-92-080, Technical Revision No. TR-10 <br />Dear Mr. Savage: <br />~~ <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />Sc <br />GEOLOGY <br />0.EC LAMATION <br />MINING•SAFETY <br />Bin o„ens <br />Governor <br />Greg E. Walther <br />E.ecubve Dueaor <br />M~chacl B Long <br />Division Duenor <br />I have reviewed Savage and Savage's May 31, 2001 responses to my adequacy letter of May 22, <br />2001. Savage and Savage's responses were received in our offices on June 4, 2001. My <br />responses follow the numbering of the adequacy items in my May 22, 2001 letter: <br />1. This item has been adequately addressed. <br />2. This item has been adequately addressed. <br />3. (a) This item has been adequately addressed. <br />(b) This item has been adequately addressed. <br />(c) This item has been adequately addressed. <br />(d) The response to this item was excellent. Please provide a revised permit page (I suggest <br />either page 5-36, 5-36a, or 5-37) to insert the response into the permit. This will help <br />clazify the discrepancy between the language of the permit, which does not mention Well <br />PWl (82-4',) in the water monitoring plan, and Map 4-3, which depicts Well PW1 (82-4) <br />as a water monitoring well. <br />(e) This item has been adequately addressed. <br />4. This item has been adequately addressed. <br />5. (a) - (n): These items have been adequately addressed. <br />