Laserfiche WebLink
k <br />y .. <br />MAY 15, 2002, MID-TERM FOLLOW-UP ITEMS <br />2.05.6(6) Subsidence Survev. Subsidence Monitoring, and Subsidence Control Plan <br />16. Please update the narrative within Section IILA.7.j of the permit application as appropriate, on <br />page III-21. Specifically, amend the statement in pazagraph 2, that "The effect of subsidence on <br />the groundwater under Red Wash and Scullion Gulch is unpredictable and purely speculative", to <br />address the effects documented by monitoring of the Red Wash alluvial wells. In addition, please <br />amend the narrative of paragraph 4 to describe visual monitoring conducted and observed effects <br />of longwall retreat mining on Panel LW-1B, beneath Scullion Gulch and Raven Park Reservoir. <br />17. Please amend the 2001 Annual Subsidence Report to include a discussion of the above referenced <br />monitoring and observed effects, and include pertinent photographs, as specified in the permit text. <br />Permit Organizational Items <br />18. Our copy of Permit Volume I, Section II.B., Geology, contains certain information not listed in <br />the Section Table of Contents. This information begins following Table II.B-2 on page II.B-14, <br />and includes Figure II.B-2 "Typical Cross Sections of the Coal Seams", Appendices 8 and 9 <br />(pages II.B-23 through II.B-52), and descriptive and analytical information for a number of drill <br />holes, on un-numbered pages following page I[.B-52. We notethat Appendices 8 and 9 aze <br />referenced in the permit text on page II.B-6. <br />Please address the appazent discrepancies between the Section Table of Contents and the actual <br />contents described, and amend as appropriate. Also, please address the nature of the appazently <br />missing Appendices 1 through 7 (pages II.B-15 through 22), and submit those pages if warranted. <br />19. Our Permit Volume 5 contains two distinctly different versions of Map 32 "Typical Drainage <br />Structures Sections and Details" (Drawing No. D-346-C-109). One copy, labeled REV.2, has a <br />copied certification by Don M. Williams, dated 2-20-81. The other copy, labeled REV. B, has a <br />copied certification by Don M. Williams, dated 10/30/80. We assume the 1981 REV. 2 is the <br />correct version, and that REV. B was replaced and can be discarded. Please advise as to whether <br />this is in agreement with your permit copy. Also, our copy of REV.2 contains only ahand-written <br />"Map 32" designation, and as noted the certification is not original. Please provide a properly <br />labeled and certified Map 32. <br />20. Maps 43 through 46 are sheets 1 through 4 of "D Portal Area Site Restoration Plan". For Maps <br />43, 44, and 46, our permit copy contains two versions of each map, REV. C, with a revision date <br />of 4/23/81, and REV. D, with a revision date of 10/13/81. The primary difference between the <br />two versions appears to be that REV. C maps depict rock checks as the primary sediment control <br />measures for the reclaimed D Portal Area, whereas REV. D maps depict incised sediment traps of <br />specified volume. REV. C maps depict 12 rock checks on reclaimed Scullion channel and <br />tributaries, whereas REV. D maps depict only three incised sediment traps, all on the main <br />channel. <br />Permit text on page V-16 references "loose rock check dams...shown on Maps 43, 44, and 46", <br />and specifically references 3 such check dams. Three rock checks were indeed constructed during <br />initial mine construction, downstream from the DP-1 pond embankment. It is possible that there <br />was a lat@r revision of this map series that restored the loose rock check dam design referenced in <br />the pennif text. Please review your permit Maps 43, 44 and 46, with respect to revision <br />designations, revision dates, and sediment control specifications. If you have more recent <br />revisions of the subject maps, or if you can otherwise clarify the apparent discrepancies, please <br />advise. If the Revision D maps dated 10/13/81 represent the approved plan, then either the map <br />design or the permit text, or both, will need to be amended to correspond. <br />