My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV14353
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV14353
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:25:32 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:51:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/15/1997
Doc Name
1996 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT FOR H-G MINE PN C-80-003 CONTAINED IN HAYDEN GULCH MINE 1996 ANNUAL REC
From
DMG
To
TERRAMATRIX INC
Type & Sequence
SL3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Michael R. Neumann <br />October I5, 1997 <br />Page 2 <br />3. The Division has the following question regarding how data are reported. Concentrations <br />of some parameters were reported in 1996 as "total recoverable", or in some cases <br />"dissolved", in contrast to past years' reports which had no such annotations. Are the <br />annotated values directly compazable to figures not annotated in prior years? <br />Water quality exceedances <br />The water monitoring data in the report and the NPDES Discharge Monitoring Reports indicate <br />that no water compliance limitations were exceeded. <br />Surface water quality -Ponds 003 and HG-8 <br />All water flowing on the ground surface (rtutoff, effluent from seeps and springs) in the permit <br />area is routed through ponds 003 and HG-8 and then flows into the stream channel of Hayden <br />Gulch which lies on the east side of County Road 53. Hayden Gulch flows southwest to the <br />Williams Fork River drainage. (Ponds 001 and 002 were reclaimed in October 1996.) There <br />were no exceedances of the ponds' dscharge limitations in 1996. <br />There is a strong contrast between the chemical composition of water from pond HG-8 compared <br />to pond 003. Pond HG-8 collects water from the mined-out pit area and the excess spoils pile. <br />Spoil springs and seeps feed HG-8. Consequently, the water is very hazd (more than 700 mg/1 of <br />calcium carbonate) and is high in total dissolved solids (greater than 2,000 mg/1). The high <br />sulfate content in 1996 (greater than 1300 mg/I) is characteristic of the oxidation. of sulfur <br />minerals (gypsum and/or iron sulfides) in coal spoils. In contrast, surface water from the west <br />side of the road in pond 003 originates from surface runoff from disturbed (but untrained) ground <br />and one natural bedrock seep. The water is relatively soft (less than 200 mg/1 of calcium <br />carbonate) and it is low in total dissolved solids (less than 300 mg/l). The sulfate content was <br />very low in 1996 at 40 mg/l. Water from pond 003 is suitable for agricultural use, but water <br />from pond HG-8 appears to be too high in sodium and sulfate for such use, which leads to the <br />following question. <br />4. Section 2.05.5 of the pettnit designates livestock grazing and wildlife habitat as the post- <br />. mining land uses of the H-G mine site. Section 2.0.4(1) of the permit says that pond <br />HG-8 is a permanent impoundment that will provide a source of water for livestock. <br />Given the pond's current high sodium and sulfate levels, please explain how pond HG-8 <br />can be used as a source of water for livestock. <br />Surface water quality -UHG-l <br />The chemical compositions of waters from the upstream surface water monitoring site, UHG-1, <br />have fluctuated within a narrow range since monitoring began in 1987. No trends in composition <br />upward or downward are evident. The water is suitable for agricultural use and possibly for <br />drinking water. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.