My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE24847
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE24847
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:33:28 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:49:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/13/1992
Doc Name
BMG SAN LUIS PROJECT PN M-88-112
From
MLKRD
To
JOANIE BERDE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Battle Mountain <br />NOPV Abatement <br />page 7 <br />Gold <br />Requirements <br />recognize potential mutual benefits and to <br />should develop, maintain and implement one <br />"critical path" project management schedule <br /> <br />avoid conflicts and delay, BMG <br />comprehensive, inte rated <br />for the abatement lan tasks. <br />The project management schedule for the BMG abatement plan tasl~s may be <br />complicated. Schedule maintenance could be facilitated by the use of <br />project management computer software (ie. ON TARGET, Harvard P ject <br />Management, TIME LINE, etc), which could be obtained by BMG an the <br />Division. This would accommodate efficient electronic exchang of <br />progress information. The schedule should be formatted as a d tailed <br />"critical path" project management schedule. The schedule sho ld be <br />divided into discrete task elements. <br />The description of each discrete abatement task element shouldlinclude: <br />(a) Methodology and practices to be applied, <br />(b) Risk entailed, <br />(Is it proven technology, methodology perfection, resear h, etc?) <br />(Is it subject to seasonality, weather, equipment availa ility?) <br />(c) Criticality of the task element, <br />(Consequences of failure or delay for abatement progress )I <br />(d) Decision points, <br />(e) Necessary relationship to other plan elements, <br />(Must it occur before or after other specific task elements?> <br />(f) Alternative methodology or practices, <br />(To be substituted if failure or delay encountered) <br />(g) Required elapsed time, <br />(h) Name of the responsible staff member(s) or contractor(s), <br />(i> Resources to be committed, <br />(BMG staff, consultants, equipment, lab), <br />(j) Required agency response(s), and <br />(Review and approval, site visit, meeting, permit issuan~e, etc) <br />(k) Abatement plan deadlines. <br />Status: Satisfied - BMG has agreed to work with the Division ~o develop <br />a critical path management schedule folio ing the <br />initial resolution of all abatement issue in a <br />letter of April 16, 1992. <br />Deadline: BMG is encouraged to prepare and submit this management plan <br />as soon as possible. The Division believes it wil assist In <br />their project control of this complex abatement pl n. <br />(12) Modification of Monitor Sampling & Analysis Protocol: <br />During the implementation of the tailings cyanide detoxificati n project, <br />approved under item (4), question arose regarding the accuracy of water <br />quality results generated by BMG in performing required sampli,g. The <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.