My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV14167
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV14167
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:25:20 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:49:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981165
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/26/1996
Doc Name
NEGLECTED MINE PN M-81-165 CN-001 ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
MINE DEVELOPMENT INC
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a <br />Received <br />Mine Development, Inc. <br />16360 Park Ten Place #325 JAN 2 6 X996 <br />Houston TX 77084 <br />(713)578-1440 Fax: (713)578-3159.-,.- - ~'"~~0 Fief Ottice <br />DMeb~~ <br />January 11, 1996 <br />Mr. Steve Shuey <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Durango Field Office <br />1474 Main Avenue, Room 207 ~P'IyER <br />Durango, Colorado 81301 <br />t~Fr~E <br />RE: Neglected Mine, Permit No. M-81-165, (Conversion No. 1 CN-001) Adequacy <br />Review _ <br />Dear Mr. Shuey, <br />Mine Development Incorporated has received the Division's preliminary adequacy <br />review. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to respond to your concerns, <br />comments, and requests. I will attempt to address all your concerns, comments, and <br />requests in this letter. The letter has been organized with the Division's comment's <br />listed in bold followed by MDI's response in regular text. <br />All information submitted in this letter is not intended to serve as an amendment to <br />MDI's conversion application. Information which will amend the conversion application <br />will follow in a separate letter. The rest of the information contained in this letter is <br />intended to clarify any questions or comments the Division has. <br />Adequacy Review Comments <br />Application Package <br />1. The post-mining land use appears to be dryland pasture rather than range <br />land. A rangeland designation would require the re-establishment of shrubs and <br />trees on the site. If MDI wishes to restore the site to rangeland, the revegetation <br />seed mix should be revised to include native shrub and tree species. <br />Additionally, shrub and tree transplants would be recommended. If dryland <br />pasture is desired for the post-mining land use, that page of the application <br />should be revised accordingly. <br />Upon reviewing Rule 3.1.1(1), dryland pasture was not an option for post mining land <br />use. MDI does wish to restore the land to dryland pasture, if this option is available to <br />us without having to change the seeding plan. MDI will revise this page of the permit <br />as necessary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.