Laserfiche WebLink
DMG Item ld• <br />The Division checked the most recent submittal of long term average TDS concentrations <br />reported in Tables 3 and 4 of Appendix 2.SA. In Table 3, the average reported for station <br />TR-A corresponds with DMG's calculations from the data provided. However, the reported <br />values for the other three stations included in the table are slightly different from the values <br />calculated by the DMG. The differences are outlined below: <br />TR-B TR-D <br />DMG 340 390 <br />P&M 333 379 <br />In Table 4, none of the long term averages correspond with DMG's calculations. The <br />differences are outlined below: <br />TR-1.5 TR-3 TR-4 WR-1 <br />DMG 257 462 505 3310 <br />P&M 290 441 488 3404 <br />P&M should explain the discrepancies in Tables 3 and 4 or make the appropriate corrections. <br />DMG Item le: <br />The documentation requested was not provided, but is no longer required since P&M provided <br />a reasonable explanation. P&M has adequately addressed this concern. <br />DMG Item lf: <br />The documentation requested was not provided, but is no longer required since P&M provided <br />a reasonable explanation. P&M has adequately addressed this concern. <br />DMG Item 1¢: <br />The text in the conclusion still needs to state clearly that the data for 1990 and 1991 were not <br />used in comparing observed values to predicted values. Again, invalid data should not be used <br />to indicate conformity with predictions in the PHC. <br />DMG Item lh: <br />This concern has not been fully addressed. Please provide the short and long term predictions <br />requested. <br />DMG Item li: <br />ever m ontare 2 cto er 1 , 1 <br />