Laserfiche WebLink
~1 <br /> infiltration of water into and movement of water through the backfilled CKD, 2) <br /> the chemical composition of the CKD, and 3) the geochemical reactions between <br /> the CKD and the water. <br /> To determine the potential impact that the backfilled CKD may pose to <br /> groundwater, a hypothetical leachate release to groundwater was simulated. <br /> Because the backfilled CKD is not expected to be saturated, the leachate formed <br /> will migrate predominantly downward and enter the groundwater system beneath <br /> G-Pit. <br />' 7.2 Simulation of the Potential Quantity of Leachate <br /> The potential volume of leachate that may be formed at the CKD disposal site <br /> was evaluated using the Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) <br /> model, version 3.07 (Schroeder, et.al., 1994). The leachate volumes predicted <br /> by theHELP model are used as the constituent release rates in the contaminant <br /> transport simulations described in Section 7.3. <br /> <br /> The HELP (Version 3, developed by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) model is a <br /> quasi-two dimensional deterministic water budget model of water movement <br /> across, into, through, and out of landfills. The model accepts climatologic, soil, <br /> and design data, and uses a solution technique that accounts for the effects of <br /> surface storage, runoff, infiltration, percolation, evapotranspiration, soil moisture <br /> storage, and lateral drainage. The program facilitates rapid estimation of the <br /> amounts of runoff, drainage, infiltration, and leachate that might be expected <br /> from a wide variety of landfill designs. The model is applicable to open, partially- <br />, closed, and fully-closed sites. <br />The CKD disposal site was simulated as a closed disposal site. The closed CKD <br />~ , disposal site is representative of the site following placement of the final cover <br />material. The area of the disposal site modeled was 20 acres with a 75 foot <br />highwall at the deepest portion of the C-Pit. Default and synthetic climatologic <br />and default soil characteristics data were used to perform the HELP analyses. <br />climatologic data for Denver, Colorado were used in the analyses. The HELP <br />modeling results are summarized in Table 7.1. HELP model output is included in <br />Appendix D. <br />' An initial HELP model run was made to determine the flux of leachate from the <br />base of the disposed CKD. The model was designed to account for the <br />approximately ~i00,000 subi6 yards of CKD expected to be disposed at the site <br />' over the next 20 years. The final cover material was assumed to be 2 feet thick <br />with a poor grass cover. The final slope of the cover material was assumed to be <br />2 percent. This disposal scenario is conservative as it minimizes the amount of <br />' evapotranspiration which allows more water to infiltrate the disposed CKD. The <br />HELP model results indicate that the closed CKD disposal site will generate a <br />leachate flux rate of approximately 0.74 inches per year at the base of the CKD. <br />Fora 20 acre disposal site, the annual leachate volume generated is about 53, <br />898 cubic feet. <br />' 15 <br /> <br />