My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV13688
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV13688
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:24:48 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:44:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981015
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/29/1994
Doc Name
Memo on Stability of Portal Bench and Highwall
From
DMG
To
STEVE RENNER
Type & Sequence
SF1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Steve Renner <br />Fruits Highwall Stability <br />page 8 <br />1994 Analysis (Highwall Complete Backfzlling) <br />The bedrock dips at approximately 7° into the highwall. Because of <br />the bedrock orientation, the seam which matches the original <br />elevation of the portal bench surface at the highwall is exposed <br />approximately 50 feet above that surface at the front of the bench. <br />In response to the Division's expression of concern, Mr. Greg <br />Lewicki performed a stability analysis of optional backfilling of <br />the portal bench aide elopes. Mr. Lewicki used the material shear <br />strength parameters developed for previous analyses. His analysis, <br />using the RBAt~ program, concluded that the necessary fill <br />configuration would not be sufficiently stable to satisfy the <br />Division's 1.3 static elope safety factor requirement. In fact, <br />the determined static and paeudoatatic factors of safety range from <br />0.787 to 0.918, suggesting the slope will not stand. <br />Mr. Lewicki's analysis is atraightforvard. In addition, it uses <br />material properties for the fill which may be higher than <br />actuality. Mr. Lewicki used these same strength parameters used in <br />his portal bench reconfiguration analysis in 1989. However, in <br />that situation the 2h:ly (26.6°) configuration had a sufficiently <br />high factor 'of safety to render concern about perfection of the <br />material parameters trivial. Mr. Lewicki's 1994 analysis is <br />limited to the "complete backfilling scenario", because that was <br />the specific directive in the amended NOV. His analysis does not <br />investigate whether partial backfilling scenarios might be stable. <br />Additional Analysis of Partial BackfiUing <br />In order. to thoroughly consider the slope stability of partial <br />backfilling scenarios for the Fruits mine portal highwalls, I <br />completed an additional stability analysis. In completing my <br />analysis I used the SBSLOPB modeling program included in the <br />software provided with the OSMRE Technical Information Processing <br />System. I have selected what I believe are conservative material <br />properties from the past analyses performed at the Fruits mine site <br />for the completion of the analysis. <br />Bedrock Material: Angle of Internal Friction (B) = 27.0° <br />(Chen & Assoc,'83) Cohesion (C) = 4,000 psf <br />Density = 135 pcf <br />Fill Material: Angle of Internal Friction (B) = 36.8° <br />(Fox & Assoc, '89) Cohesion (C) = 0 psf <br />Density = 116 pcf <br />Pseudo Static Acceleration Factor = 0.102 g <br />(Geo Testing, '79) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.