Laserfiche WebLink
1"'. <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl of Natural Resources <br />131 3 Sherman SI., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80207 <br />Phone: (7031 8L6-3567 <br />FAX: 603)83?-8106 <br />September 6, 1996 <br />Mr. Timothy L. Roberts, County Engineer <br />Montrose County <br />P.O. Box 1289 <br />Montrose, CO 81402 <br />~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />lames S. Lochhead <br />E~ecuuve Director <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Director <br />RE: Neal Pit (Permit-83-148) County response, dated September 3, <br />1996, to Division's adequacy review of conversion application <br />Deatr Mr. Roberts: <br />I have reviewed the above referenced response and can, with one <br />exception, accept it as satisfying the adequacy concerns indicated <br />to you in my review letter of June 18, 1996. The remaining adequacy <br />concern is the absence of an acceptable seed mix to be used in <br />revegetating the site. If you can provide a seed mix, acceptable <br />to the Division, by the decision date of September 24, 1996, I can <br />approve the application without conditions, providing all other <br />issues (listed below) are satisfactorily addressed. If you cannot <br />provide an acceptable seed mix by that date, I will approve the <br />application with a condition that such a seed mix, acceptable to <br />the Division, be provided prior to the commencement of reclamation <br />at the site. <br />There are two other issues that must be addressed by the decision <br />date in order for the Division to approve the conversion <br />application for the Neal Pit. These are as follows: <br />1) As indicated to you in Ms. Lavern Lemay's letter of April <br />9, 1996, it is the practice of the Division to require proof <br />of receipt of notices sent in the form of the signed and <br />postal date-stanped green Certified Mail cards. You have <br />supplied copies of those cards; the Division would like to <br />have the cards themselves. <br />2) The response did not include evidence that the corrections <br />to the initial conversion application, which now make that <br />application approvable, were added to the copy of the <br />conversion a~~plication on file at the County Clerk and <br />Recorder's Office. Please supply such evidence, ie. a signed <br />and dated receipt from the Clerk and Recorder's Office, that <br />the material included in the County's adequacy response were <br />added to the original copy of the application. <br />