Laserfiche WebLink
~, <br />r iii iiiiuiiiiiu-ii <br />STATE OF COLC~>~UO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depdnrnern nl Natural Resources <br />111 5 Sherman 51., Room ? I S d <br /> <br />Denver. ColoraAn 90'_03 Il <br />~~ <br /> <br />I'hnne 11011 tl66-356,' I <br />F\X: I IUSI if }~.p 106 <br />October 6, 1998 DEPARTIvIENT OF <br /> NATURAL <br /> RESOURCES <br />Via fax, hard copy to follow by mail <br /> Roy Romer <br /> Governor <br />Mr. Forrest Luke lames 5. Lochhead <br />Environmental Ivfanaeer <br /> <br />., <br />Er,ecunve Director <br /> <br />Trapper Mining Inc Michael B. Long <br />. DrviSion Dhec~or <br />P.O. Box 187 <br />Craig, Colorado 81626 <br />Re: Trapper Mining Inc., Permit No. C-81-010 <br />Technical Revision TR-78, 1997 Annual Report <br />Deaz Mr. Luke: <br />The Division has completed its review of the above-referenced report and has the following <br />comments. Please note that the comments requiring responses are: 2, 4, 10, 11, 12, and 14. <br />Reaortioe Requirements <br />Fulfillment of reporting requirements. The report fulfills for ] 997 all of Trapper's <br />annual reporting requirements; these include: <br />a) Reclamation report (Section 2.04.13 of the Regulations), <br />b) Hydrology report (Section 4.0~.13(4)(c) of the Regulations), <br />c) Reclamation map (Section 3.5.3 of Trapper's permit), <br />d) Spoil sampling report (Section 2.7.2 of Trapper's permit), <br />e) Topsoil map and report (Section 4.9.2 of Trapper's permit), <br />f1 Stock ponds map (Section 3.6.3.8 of permit) <br />g) Dozer basins map (Section 4.8.1.7 of permit) <br />2. Missing hydrologic monitoring data. The Division has compared the monitoring data <br />contained in the report to the monitoring requirements in Trapper's permit (Section <br />4.8.S.la for surface water and Section 4.8.5.2a for ground water). Table 1, below, lists <br />specific monitoring data not found in the report which are required by the permit. The <br />Division would expect the one-time omissions of these data to not hinder the monitoring <br />program, but requests an explanation for these omissions in order to evaluate the <br />effectiveness of overall monitoring procedures. <br />