My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV13649
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV13649
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:24:46 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:44:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/14/1997
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Type & Sequence
RN3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. On page .i.7-7, P&M lists the off cers and directors of the Powell Bend Mining Company. <br />~ According; to the AVS and OSM, the Powell Bend Mining Company was dissolved on <br />April 30, 1995. Please see the attached documentation for further detail. Please revise <br />~.~ page 3.7-7 to reflect this information. <br />~ ~~~ <br />P&M tnciuded the organizational structure for the Black Beauty Coal Company, but did <br />~,s~,,~a y~. not state the relationship between P&Mand Black Beauty. Please revise the text to <br />clarify this relationship. <br />Text concerning Powell Bend Mining Company and Black Beauty Coal Company have <br />been revi:>ed to provide the information requested. Additionally, the Officers and <br />Directors., permits held, and NOV history have been updated to be consistent with <br />information in the AVS database. <br />7. Section 4.3, Topsoil Management, was revised to reflect the most recent topsoil mass <br />balance. In that section, P&Mstates that topsoil was replaced on 132.6 acres in the <br />West Ridl;e area. The previously approved text indicated 144 acres would be covered. <br />What is tine reason for the reduction in acreage? <br />The difference in acreage in the previously approved text and the current text are caused <br />by several factors. The two primary factors causing the difference include: 1) a three <br />percent difference between the original estimate of topsoil available for salvage (181,515 <br />yds') and the final estimate of topsoil salvaged (177,030 yds'); and 2) a one inch <br />difference between the eight inch topsoil replacement depth previously proposed and the <br />actual nine inch average topsoil replacement depth on acreage retopsoiled in 1995. <br />12. The revised Section 4.4 no longer includes information the Division believes is pertinent <br />o , and should be retained. <br />1- a. Pages 4.4-6 (Riparian Standards), 4.4-11 (riparian seed mixture), and 4.4-20 <br />(seed application) have all been revised to delete reference to reestablishment of <br />riparian areas. P&M notes that, because the Trout Creek disturbance did not <br />occur and the road through the Oak Creek riparian area will be permanent, there <br />ar•e no riparian areas to revegetate. Since permanent retention of the road has <br />rapt yet been approved, P&Mshould retain the sections regarding riparian areas. <br />P.&M could add these proposed changes to those proposed in Technical Revision <br />3:i. <br />The various sections describing riparian standards, seed mixture and seed <br />application have been revised to retain the discussions regarding riparian areas. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.