REV13572 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii Minutes, August 22 - 23, 1990 DRAFT Subject To Board Approval 5 Staff Presentation by Dan Mathews: 6. FORMAL PUBLIC HEARING NY File No. C-81-039 c/o Mr. Dean Massey Parcel, Mauro, Hultin & Spaanstra 1801 California Street, Suite 3600 Denver, CO 80202 Secs. 20, 21, 28, 29, 31 and 32, T5N, R78W, Routt County, Grassy Gap Mine; surface coal mine. Consider Staff recommendation on bond forfeiture. Monthly status update (continued from the July Board Meeting). Two inspections of this site have been conducted since the July Board Meeting. Staff stated that the reclamation of this site is being conducted according to the approved schedule. The company has requested reduction of a portion of the bond, based on the amount of work completed to this point. The Division has scheduled a bond inspection for the first week of September. Staff Presentation by John Doerfer: DISCUSSION ITEM inera u e-ma ing. Consideration and adoption of changes to existing rules and regulations of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act. Article 32 of Title 34, C.R.S. The rule-making is proposed pursuant to the authority granted under 34-32-108, C.R.S. Rules to be considered include those continued from the June 27, 1990 hearing as published in the Colorado Register on April 10, 1990, and rules identified in the notice pu6T'isTe3-in~Fie- Colorado Register on July 10, 1990. The Director provided updated information regarding the rule-making meetings. The Assistant Attorney General, as well as some Board members have attended some of these meetings. At this time, the Division is not prepared to present the Board with a rule-making package and recommend action. The Director stated that the Division would request that the Board grant a continuance of the rule-making to the September Board Meeting. At that time, the Division would conduct a full discussion of the details of this issue. There are same rules upon which same disagreement may remain. The Division would take time to isolate those disagreements so that a clear set of issues could be presented to the Board at the September Board Meeting. The Division recommended that the Board continue rule-making. Mr. Frank Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, discussed briefly the major being considered at the informal conferences: issues of 1) the new process the Division is recommending for approval of 112 permit applications, including delegation of decision authority to the Division and 2) conferring.