My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV13559
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV13559
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:24:39 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:43:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/15/1991
Doc Name
PN C-81-012 TR-23 AT NEW ELK MINE PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
MLRD
To
WYOMING FUEL CO
Type & Sequence
TR23
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ~ <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />-Department of Natural Resources <br />1373 Sherman St.. Room 2t6 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303 8663567 <br />FAX: 303 8328106 <br />OF CO,p <br />Ne(' <br />.l\' ~ <br />Roy Romer. <br />Governor <br />Freo R. Banta. <br />prvision pvector <br />August 15, 1991 <br />Mr. Bob Green <br />Wyoming Fuel Co. <br />10250 Highway 12 <br />Weston, CO 81091 <br />RE: Technical Revision 23 at New Elk Mine; Preliminary Adequacy <br />Review (C-81-012, TR-23j <br />Dear Mr. Green: <br />The Division has completed its preliminary adequacy review of TR- <br />23, concerning small area exemption demonstrations at the New Elk <br />Mine. The following adequacy concerns were identified and need to <br />be addressed. <br />1. west portal substation: The application indicates that this <br />area will be reclaimed and therefore, no longer have to meet <br />effluent limits. The Division would like to see the area reclaimed <br />at this time however, reclaimed areas are disturbed areas and as <br />such, are subject to the same requirements as other disturbed area <br />at the mine. WFC must still submit evidence that surface runoff <br />from the reclaimed area will meet effluent limits. It may be <br />necessary to provide some type of alternate sediment control for <br />the area such as a berm or silt fence. <br />2. west portal water tank: The comments above apply to this area <br />as well. <br />3. West portal fan area: It was determined that runoff from this <br />area enters containment area #2. Please indicate whether this area <br />is already accounted for in the calculations for the containment <br />area in the permit. If not, the calculations for the containment <br />need to be modified. <br />4. West portal powder and cap house: Control of runoff from this <br />area in the large sump area described in the application may be <br />adequate. However, the documentation provided indicates that the <br />affected watershed is 0.5 acres. Unless runoff from the area <br />upslope from the permit area is diverted, runoff from the watershed <br />contributing to the channel near the powder and cap houses needs to <br />be accounted for. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.