Laserfiche WebLink
.~ <br /> <br />r <br />GOLD HILL VENTURES <br />P.O. Box 1523 <br />Longmont, Colorado 80501 <br />~II III~IIII~~~~~ ~I~ <br />September 24, 1985 <br /> <br />Mr. Peter V. O'Connor SEP 2 5 198 <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />1313 Sherman Street {~F,IN[ii i_ANU <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 RECLA.fi1ATICN DIVISION <br />RE: CASH MINE AMENDMENT -PERMIT NO. M83-141 <br />Dear Mr. O'Connor: <br />This letter is in response to the issues that you raised in your letter of <br />September 20, 1985, which I received on September 23, 1985. <br />1. Gold Hill Ventures' consulting water resources engineers, Ted <br />Zorich and Associates, Inc., have calculated that a 100-year/ <br />24-hour storm event over the precipitation catchment area would <br />result in approximately twice the amount of water runoff of a <br />5-year/24-hour storm event. Because the hillside location selected <br />for the tailings impoundment structure has such a limited precipita- <br />tion catchment area, our consulting water resources engineers <br />decided that drainage ditches designed to handle the 5-year/24-hour <br />storm event would be sufficient for this site. However, if the Mined <br />Land Reclamation Division's reclamation staff has taken the posi- <br />tion that the diversion ditches should be sized to handle the <br />100-year/24-hour storm event, we will ask Ted Zorich and_ <br />Associates, Inc., to redesign the aversion ditches to handle the <br />larger water runoff vol~ume~ copy of your final calculations <br />regarding the different construction requirements for these two <br />storm events would be very useful for comparison with our data. <br />Did your figures assume an instantaneous time of water concentra- <br />tion? Were your calculations based upon the assumption that all of <br />the precipitation is going to run off the precipitation catchment <br />area? It will also be helpful to know if your calculations considered <br />if any water would be lost due to depressions in the terrain. <br />2. My letter of September 23, 1985, addressed this question in some <br />detail. However, upon examining the exploration opportunities that <br />exist along the Who Do vein, we have concluded that the removal <br />of 11,500 tons of waste rock from the Who Do mine dump will <br />enable us to conduct an additional 350 feet of important under- <br />ground exploration drifting. This amount of exploration drifting will <br />replace the amount of waste rock removed to install the minimum <br />two foot rock capillary barrier between the mill tailings and the <br />topsoil medium that you deemed necessary in your letter of <br />.~ <br />'` t. <br />x ~~ <br />~~'~~ <br />N' <br />u <br />